Jump to content

JSkorna

Registered Users
  • Posts

    1,932
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by JSkorna

  1. Mark, you may as well save your breath, there are those here that will never be convinced it is not all down to user systems, user errors, inability of user.

    I think the problem is that they don't use it as a simulator. It's nice scenery, and good for screenshots, but it is not a simulator because it doesn't simulate anything. It tries to but it can't, it is so full of bugs they don't seem to be able to fix.

    I still use it when I want to see what some part of the earth looks like, I could use Google Earth, but it's fun to fly over places. But for "Flight Simulation" I still use FS2004 and XPLANE. These are still far far better Flight Simulators.

    Geoff

     

    It works for many of us just fine. Yes, better than your FS2004 and XPLANE. Maybe you should hold your breath too.

  2. To put some perspective on this I would just like to remind folks that the same excellent result was reproduced in FS9 15 years ago with Ultimate Terrain 1.2 and Flight Ontario's Toronto scenery. And come to think of it, MSFS is actually a better Ultimate Terrain and not a better simulator, as it falls short where both FS9 and FSX did before which was (and is) the scenery at ground level.

     

    Please post a video comparing MSFS default and FS9/FSX tricked out scenery of this same flight. Or screenshots would work too!

×
×
  • Create New...