GKKnupper

Hi, I guess I have what you are looking for ! Sincerely G. Kirschstein gkcherry11@t-online.de

Hi, did you see this file : c160vz.zip This is from ONE of the BEST designers from the Ukraine. Vladimir Zhuhilsky and his designs are usually O U T S T A N D I N G. IF it does not fly correctly let me know and I fix it for you. Thank you very much. Sincerely G. Kirschstein

@tgibson_new It is very simple ..... you wish for it OMG Sincerely G. Kirschstein

@peer01 Mr. Peerhoven, thanks for the explanation. Otherwise she flies very well .. Thank you very much. Sincerely Guenter Kirschstein

hi mr. Peerhoven! 1 question PLEASE: Why was it a beast ? Thank you very much Sincerely Guenter Kirschstein

Hi, your FDE files are ready to pick up. Top Speed as specs call for 222 kts = 255 mph. She flies as a Dive Bomber should fly. Not to agile BUT still agile enough to avoid enemy fire. Send an email to: gkcherry11@t-online.de I will reply with the new FDE set. Sincerely G. Kirschstein

@malcott "But the difference - even a small one - is worth it! " WHAT are you trying to point out with this kind of BALONY !! Sincerely G. Kirschstein P.S. The motto of many should be : I do NOT know BUT a lot of it !! UNBELIEVABLE ignoran t people here !!

"I like my aircraft to fly as realistic as possible. So if it flies like a brick IRL, it should fly like a brick in FS2004. If a B747 flies like a jet fighter, it's not really a simulator anymore..." Finally someone with common sense ... BUT many , many , many like it the other way around! and their motto is: "Do not take it to seriously .." and do NOT simulate they rather play Video games on a Simulator. Sincerely G. Kirschstein

hi, even this program might find duplicate errors etc and you fix them you still can get this ctd ... sincerely g. kirschstein

hi colonal, if there are NAV light entries in the aircraft.cfg file make them inoperational ";" in front of the 3 lines. if the plane still shows NAV lights THAN they are part of the MDL file. I have NOT found a way to inactivate them in the MDL. BUT after eliminating the entries in the aircraft.cfg file THAN there is a way to correct this annoying problem. In the FS9.CFG files there are 3 entries to make the correction. WARNING WARNING the BLUE Taxi way and the GREEN Center line lights can NOT be corrected. Sincerely G. Kirschstein

Hi, you do not haave to move anything. just rename the aircraft.CFG file to xaircraft.cfg in the folder one by one until you find the aircraft. Sincerely G. Kirschstein

Sorry this is NOT true .. " in general never use flyable aircraft as AI because their external textures are far too large, too many, too detailed and always unmipped, giving your graphics system a hard time in trying to render them every time such "AI" aircraft come into view. Stuttering and frame rate loss is almost always the result and is especially true when you have more of these "AIs" flying or taxiing around your flyable aircraft." I fly >200 in an 60 nm radius at 6 different airports. MIA to PBI and whatever is between them. Your System Config (I.E. FS9 on an SEPERATE HD / SSD, my FS9 is 495 GB), your HD (SSD) HW Layout /Installation is another factor. Sorry , but that is the truth I never ever see any stuttering . ALL my AI planes are the same for piloting in ILS, Autopilot environment. Sincerely G. Kirschstein

Hi, EVERYTHING works, no need to do any xlation. She works at every instance for engine start up correctly, NOW. Sincerely G. Kirschstein

Senore, IF the designer of the plane would have used the correct design method you could change any N-number the way you like it. by font by color by size just take the standard MS planes, Cessna 172, 182, DC-3 and in the Selection sequence you can change the n-number. IF you would like to have it PERMANENTLY done for ANY entry for any plane in the aircraft.CFG file you must just , very easely doe, change THREE line Entries to achieve what you desire . sincerely g. kirschstein

one of the gauges are preventing the light to come on. just rename the panel file to ppanel , check in the aircraft.cfg file what panel name is used for the plane you are flying, if it not the panel name than just butcher the name either in the config or rename the panel name name. to fly the plane you do not have to have a panel. the keyboard can do the function , with the f-keys.. phase 2 deactivate all gauges by putting a ";" in front of them or in blocks to find which gauge does it. IF you would like to send me one of the planes which does not work I will fix it for you FREE of charge (hahaha) gkcherry11@t-online.de sincerely g. kirschstei

Good morning Mr. Hans here is the fix for it. I do NOT understand why the designer can make this mistake in his XML coding. It has to do with a Gauge he is using in the NORMAL Cockpit and this STUPIDITY of having this Crap in his Virtual Cockpit. To fix it do the following as I show here in the Panel.CFG file in the [Vcockpit01] Section: [Vcockpit01] file=$An3PanelLeft.bmp size_mm=1024,1024 visible=1 window_size= 1.000, 1.000 pixel_size=1024,1024 texture=$An3PanelLeft window_pos= 1.000, 1.000 gauge38=An3Gau!An3TabloRazryd, 745,411,38,58 ;gauge39=An3Gau!An3FuelSwVC, 607,210,126,98 gauge40=An3Gau!An3ControlBIP, 332,99,18,18 Get Rid of Line 39 by inserting a semicolon (:) or double (//) Hope it helps you. There is still the function available in the "Normal Cockpit". I do NOT understand that the designer made this error in his XML Coding. The so Called L-Type definitions are GLOBAL for the TOTAL of "That, His" airplane. What happens the gauge in the Normal Cockpit says ON while the gauge in the VC uses the same Nomenclature of naming and therefore his logic switch the Fuel Off AND Than you are done !!! PERIOD , no chance to start the engine again. I am scarce on time , have to fix my Antique car and it took me 5 hours to find this incorrect programmed gauge, used in the normal cockpit and the IDIOTIZED VC Crap. I as a REAL Pilot can NOT understand how anybody can fly in the VC CRAP environment. It is UNREAL , this is NOT what you have in an real plane. By the way I built my own High Performance plane and was my own test pilot ... Thank you very much. Sincerely G. Kirschstein Pls answer me at my email please : gkcherry11@t-online.de

Hi Senore' Carlos. I RE- MEASURED the airplane for dimensions, Geometrie section.(Whhel diameter, Wing Span etc All the Contact points are now at the correct value. The Wing Area was, I guess done for the BIGGEST Bomber on earth. The Plane did fly in the RELEASED version because the engine power was 5X the real value! The engine inlet area was 111 sqft .... The same is true for the Wing area of >5K sqft etc The air file does NOt fit the plane either ... So a CORRECT CFG file is available and by utilizing, for that weight class, the Boeing B-737 Air file which works very well. IF you are interested to get the FDE set sent me a email to: gkcherry11@t-online.de and I will reply your email with the CFG & Air file. Sincerely G. Kirschstein

Hi Senore' Carlos. I RE- MEASURED the airplane for dimensions, Geometrie section.(Whhel diameter, Wing Span etc All the Contact points are now at the correct value. The Wing Area was, I guess done for the BIGGEST Bomber on earth. The Plane did fly in the RELEASED version because the engine power was 5X the real value! The engine inlet area was 111 sqft .... The same is true for the Wing area of >5K sqft etc The air file does NOt fit the plane either ... So a CORRECT CFG file is available and by utilizing, for that weight class, the Boeing B-737 Air file which works very well. IF you are interested to get the FDE set sent me a email to: gkcherry11@t-online.de and I will reply your email with the CFG & Air file. Sincerely G. Kirschstein

hi, you just can NOT state these 3 lines !!! the weight, MOI are having a big IMPACT as well !!! The figures 1.0, 2.5, 0.8100 are TOTALLY wrong ...... The distance of the of the Nose Gear sees to be pretty good. not only the [Contact_Points] are simply "well defined" BUT the DIMENSIONS in [Airplane_Geometry] section are very "Precise" as well ... OMG sincerely g. kirschstein

hi, a 32bit system can not address 4gb sincerely g. kirschstein

Hi Colonel, why don't you Windows XP 64 bit ? I switch very often between Windows XP 32 bit and the 64 bit Windows XP REFERRING the SAME FS9 on a seperate HD Drive. FS2004 is ALWAYS installed on his OWN HD (actually everything is on SSD Drives for Performance reasons). Sincerely G. Kirschstein

Hi, There is NO Hold Short line visible at the RED Hold point ABOVE the RWY ! That could be THAT another BLUE Point is hidden under the Hold Short Node. The Hold Short BELOW the RWY SHOWS a Hold Short Line. Just move the RED Hold Short Node and see what might be located beneth it . Sincerely G. Kirschstein P.S. What Airports you are comparing, Good one Berlin Tempelhof and the other ???

hallo herr leuenberger. ich verstehe ihre frage nicht. senden sie mir bitte eine email die sie haben. gruss g. kirschstein

hi, sorry forgot to also mention. IF you have MANY gauges and MANY effects in the directories stored, FS9 for UNKNOWN reason SCANS E V E R Y of the objects in the directories mentioned. just try it, store only 1 gauge and 1 effect in the corresponding directory and see the difference in FS9 start up time. why , beats me did report it to MS years ago never got an answer. sincerely g. kirschstein

hi, depends on your system hw config. i have way over 1000 planes in the directory, i do not have any "special ai planes" EVERY of my so called "normal planes flies in AI. my fs9 is 495 gb in size and NO stutter with >200 AI planes active. my fs9 is on a separate hard drive AND on a different HD Controller than windows xp .. try do Defrag your Windows, if you can split your system in fs9 and windows on different hd dries & hd controller. my system loads in fs9 in 5 seconds BUT i use ONLY SSD drives . my second system takes almost 50 seconds to load fs9 BECAUSE, same layout concept but HD based, after load performance is acceptable ... BUT NO COMPARISON TO SSD. JUST a couple of ideas to consider. sincerely g. kirschstein