Jump to content

johnost

Registered Users
  • Posts

    493
  • Joined

Posts posted by johnost

  1. I run an LG 34" curved monitor (3440x1440) and could never go back. I don't know your Radeon card and would not know how it would perform, but there are many other people running with 4 GB RAM cards, so I don't think you would be dead in the water. If FPS is too low, you may have to reduce the resolution until you can get a better card. I am doing fine with my old 1080 TI in a mix of settings between Ultra and High, but it does have 11GB of RAM, and I am sure that is why it can still kick.
  2. Sorry - I did not think (not unusual!) - but I do use a mix of a Saitek X55 PRO Throttle and a Thrustmaster T 16000M Flightstick without problems in ALL my flightsims including FSX, P3D, XP11 and MSFS 2020. This does not answer your question, but I would expect you would not have any problems.
  3. My relatively trouble-free journey with MSFS finally ended for the first time. After latest update every flight crashes after about 5 minutes. I have never had any CTD's before, Community folder is cleared, nothing else has changed. I don't think this problem is unique to me, as I see that numerous people are reporting the identical problem in MSFS discussions on Steam.

     

    John O.

  4. If you mean increasing the sim's frame rates, I haven't tried to change mine. I have it on "high" settings for scenery and whatnot, and the frame limit is 60 fps. Maybe I should lower it? I'd had only a couple CTDs prior to yesterday--once on approach to Monterey and once parking at San Jose. I'm wondering if something in the most recent update from Asobo might be causing my program to crash more frequently now.

     

    No - I was not talking about frame rates, but rather overall simulation speed, i.e. cutting flight time. You can use it to reduce flight time on long distance flights by a factor of 2, 4, 8, or 16, but it apparently puts enormous stress on the system. Anyway, that is not your problem.

  5. Brings back memories of many, many business flights in the 60's from Rochester, NY, to Chicago - forgot which airline, but I think it was American. The entire plane was Business Class, the rear end of the cabin had semi-circular sofa seat, and free cocktails were served by stewardesses (they were in those days), who were all young and pretty wearing miniskirt uniforms. Those were the good old days!
  6. Here is the difference between us. I want the feeling I am flying a real aircraft. It is a flight simulator after all.

     

    A good quality airport in FS9 gives me all the visual immersion I am looking for and FS9 fills all the other needs of a flight sim.

     

    Each to their own but you are clearly putting visuals above all else and visuals alone you must admit does not make a flight simulator. MSFS is lacking in every other area.

     

     

    Everybody is looking for "immersion". I can't think of anything being more important to immersion than the environment in which you are flying, i.e. the cockpit and outside scenery. The realism of the handling of the aircraft certainly is important, but probably only to those who have real piloting experience. The scenery in MSFS trumps all other flight sims, and many of the planes and cockpit are on par.

×
×
  • Create New...