Roger Wensley Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 I just made an airfield that has a one-ended runway, in that at one end there is a huge hill. So, 28 is used for landing and 10 is used for take off. To get the AI to conform I marked 28 as not available for take off, and 10 not available for landing. On my first test flight inward bound I found that when I was asked to select a runway for landing there was no runway at all in the list to select from. But, after landing, parking, and then preparing for take off, when I was asked to select a runway from the list there was a runway, the correct one, 10. I checked that I had them correctly tagged in case I had marked them both as not available for landing, but it was correct, 28 not for take off, and 10 not for landing. Ideas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrenvox Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 You have 28 and 10 not allowed to takeoff and or land??? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk WJA221, BFL0200, ASA2703 http://www.darrensfs9site.weebly.com http://darrensflightsimblog.blogspot.com/ https://discord.gg/6d5V7Qu << <<<fs9 discord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
il88pp Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 does the airport have a tower frequency? (and perhaps others like ATIS?) And, did you get the "10" from tower? or ground? It sounds like there's a ground freq, that knows about 10. But no tower. So nobody to tell planes about 28. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiger1962 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 If the airport/runways show up on the GPS map, could this be a wind direction issue? Tim Wright "The older I get, the better I was..." Xbox Series X, Asus Prime H510M-K, Intel Core i5-11400F 4.40GHz, 16Gb DDR4 3200, 2TB WD Black NVME SSD, 1TB Samsung SATA SSD NVidia RTX3060 Ti 8Gb, Logitech Flight Yoke System, CH Pro Pedals, Acer K272HL 27", Windows 11 Home x64 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Wensley Posted March 6, 2017 Author Share Posted March 6, 2017 28 is for landings only 10 is for take offs only there is no tower, just the one frequency on which you announce your intentions it is not a wind direction issue for AI, they happily take off on 10 even if the wind is directly astern. And if I am allowed to do the same and select 10 for a downwind take off why wouldn't I get to select 28 for an upwind landing? Or at least be offered it as a choice, instead of no choice at all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiger1962 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 If the AI don't land on 28 either, have you tried setting 28 for take off and landing? Tim Wright "The older I get, the better I was..." Xbox Series X, Asus Prime H510M-K, Intel Core i5-11400F 4.40GHz, 16Gb DDR4 3200, 2TB WD Black NVME SSD, 1TB Samsung SATA SSD NVidia RTX3060 Ti 8Gb, Logitech Flight Yoke System, CH Pro Pedals, Acer K272HL 27", Windows 11 Home x64 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrenvox Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Roger, is it still set as 10 not available to land? There's you're problem Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk WJA221, BFL0200, ASA2703 http://www.darrensfs9site.weebly.com http://darrensflightsimblog.blogspot.com/ https://discord.gg/6d5V7Qu << <<<fs9 discord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilefty999 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 As far as I remember MS never allowed for one ended rwy's. You can close the whole rwy for TO or landing, but not one end. Even though you can do it in the afcad, fs doesn't recognize it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Wensley Posted March 7, 2017 Author Share Posted March 7, 2017 The AI does as alllowed, lands on 28, takes off on 10. I would not set 28 for take off as well as landing for the same reason as the real airfield; if you take off on 28 you are not going anywhere except into solid rock. How is setting 10 not for use as landing my problem? I do not want to land on 10, I want to be offered 28 for landing by the "pick a runway to land on from this list" Well, when you say that FS does not recognise a one ended runway I can only remind you that in the present case AI are recognising it and taking off on a downwind runway 10 Never mind, everything is working except being allowed to ANNOUNCE that I intend to land on 28; I can land and park and then announce a take off on 10 and the AI are using the right runways too so no conflicts. When I post it I just have to mention the minor hiccup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atcramon Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 Did you set an starting point at runway10? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnhinson Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 Roger - you seem to expect FS2004 to work flawlessly for every possible circumstance in real life. This is one they did not provide for - a pretty rare arrangement at that. It may be frustrating but we have to live with it. John http://www.adventure-unlimited.org My co-pilot's name is Sid and he's a star! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Wensley Posted March 7, 2017 Author Share Posted March 7, 2017 Hello John, You know as well as I do that making scenery turns up all sorts of gremlins, and all you can do is hope that someone else found a weird way to fix it! And sometimes there is that someone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asos Posted May 7, 2017 Share Posted May 7, 2017 Roger, You may be able to get rid of the hill by using the exclude function of Airport Facilitator (AFX). I have used it with success to get rid of unwanted trees, buildings, and many autogen objects in the airport area. HOWEVER, with Ttools, do open ALL runways for take-off and landing before you make the exclude. Nick, Athens, Greece Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Wensley Posted May 8, 2017 Author Share Posted May 8, 2017 Yes, but that has nothing to do with landing on 28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Wensley Posted May 8, 2017 Author Share Posted May 8, 2017 I do not want to get rid of the hill as it there in real life too, and I had to buy a 19m mesh to get the hill there in the first place! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asos Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 Roger, I see... And I do agree with John Hinson--you seem to want to eat the cake and have the dish full of it too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Wensley Posted May 8, 2017 Author Share Posted May 8, 2017 I tried, but it seems there is no solution. Nothing wrong with striving towards reality! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.