Ah, the grand old issue. What's to make of it? Most agree that it's wrong, but after that we enter a debate riddled with heated opinions and vastly different ideaology. Few things are as gray.
What about drinking and driving? That's an easy one to talk about. Even recovering alcoholics and drivers with DUIs on their records will tell you it's wrong to drive after you're up to .08, which for most people is one drink. There are no people waiting in the wings to argue that under certain and/or special circumstances, you can drive over the legal limit. You just shouldn't drink and drive over the legal limit any way you slice it.
Back to the point, if you'll kindly follow me. Where's your personal limit for piracy? Have you downloaded MP3s? Have you downloaded software that's no longer for sale even though it was never released from copyright? See where I'm going?
We can take this argument 72 ways from Sunday and get lost in the process. It seems that around here, these debates end up off track and a few sets of feelings get hurt every time.
My recently locked thread explored personal opinion when it came to reselling software. You see, it's too broad to discuss. Software is covered by the same laws that tackle other forms of media, even including books. There are other legalities to consider as well.
Who's hands are clean? Who hasn't borrowed a movie a friend has rented for their own use? Who's never burned a CD? Even if you haven't done it yourself, I'll bet you know someone with a massive MP3 collection that was downloaded.
Yes, these acts DO put you in the same category as someone who's stolen payware MSFS products. If you've downloaded 4 songs from 4 different albums through limewire, You've (if you'd have purchased them otherwise) taken 40 plus dollars from the music industry. Taking it a bit further, you've stolen the equivalent of the CLS DC-10, which goes for 40 dollars at the pilotshop: https://www.fspilotshop.com/product_info.php?products_id=1161
If you fit any of these descriptions, I'm not writing this to badmouth you or pretend I'm better than you like some might. It's possible that I'm even offending both sides here. I'm simply exploring the 'common sense' side of piracy. In fact I'll go so far as to say that anybody reading this has more likely than not committed some form of piracy in their lifetime.
When I was a child, I remember standing in line in Frye's electronics as two men argued over why one couldn't let the other just install their new copy of windows. At the time, we had a lightning fast 386 at our house. This goes to show how long these things have been going on.
Somehow we think when we commit acts such as these we're different than the other guys who are the 'real' problem; but are we?
Who is the other guy? When you see a pirate, do you see someone with a computer full of every single new release for MSFS, drinking coffee in a smoke filled room in Holland, creating bittorrents so that others may download them? Do you see (snickers to self) a guy with a trenchoat: "psst. hey buddy. wanna buy the IRIS F-15?"
Who is it? Who are they? Is there a big crime ring? Are there kingpins of MSFS piracy? I for one, doubt it. I honestly think that there may be 'lords of piracy' out there, but I also think that 99.999999 percent of MSFS software piracy is the average user who downloads one product a few times a year. Things like movies are probably different. We all know that people do get DVD burners and churn out movies by the 100s.
I'm not here to differentiate between illegal behavior, but I really think that's nobody's hands are completely clean; for whatever that means to you. (hopefully) We agree that piracy's wrong, right? We should be able to talk about piracy here and elsewhere without treating others like we're better than them.