lmhariano Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 Avianca MD-82*, from SKBO to SKBG. *In the real world, Avianca had MD-83. However, the Maddog for FS9 only simulates the MD-82. Best regards, Luis Hernández Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jfwright Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 Interesting shot. The cloud layer off in the distance kind of looks like smog. Jim I am a King Air fan. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAVIDSTRAKA Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 Good looking shot! :pilot: Senior Rookie Bragware: FSX Gold - Acceleration | HP Omen Obelisk Desktop | Intel Core i7 3.2 Ghz |16GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 | 1TB HD | 256 GB SSD (Gaming Computer) REX Worldwide Airports HD AS16 + ASCA ORBX Global BASE ORBX Freeware Airports ORBX HD Trees [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flightsimg Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 And no good freeware? Gérard Guichard, Dijon, Burgundy, France. i5 Intel processor, 4 Go of Ram, Nvidia GeForce 920MX, DirectX 12.0, and FSX Gold Edition with SP1, SP2. My personal flightsim website is at http://flightlessons.6te.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmhariano Posted July 29, 2019 Author Share Posted July 29, 2019 Thank you all for your words! I'm glad you've liked it. Interesting shot. The cloud layer off in the distance kind of looks like smog. Jim Hahaha, true: I was already approaching my hometown airport (SKBG). And no good freeware? Sorry, I didn't understand... Best regards, Luis Hernández Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peer01 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 Always good to see a freighter! :cool::cool::pilot: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flightsimg Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 Sorry, I didn't understand... I meant: isn't there a good freeware for the plane you would use (I understand that the Maddog one is a given product). But I think the quality, from what I saw at their site and from what I understood might be hard to find back with a freeware aircraft :) Gérard Guichard, Dijon, Burgundy, France. i5 Intel processor, 4 Go of Ram, Nvidia GeForce 920MX, DirectX 12.0, and FSX Gold Edition with SP1, SP2. My personal flightsim website is at http://flightlessons.6te.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NMLW Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 Very nice. :cool: :) Larry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmhariano Posted July 29, 2019 Author Share Posted July 29, 2019 I meant: isn't there a good freeware for the plane you would use Oh, now I understand. Anyway, externally, there are almost no differences between all the MD-80 models (-81, -82, -83 and -88). All the differences lie in flight decks, engines and fuel tanks. FDE (and maybe gauges) would have to be modified to reflect this, but it's OK for me as is... Best regards, Luis Hernández Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aerofoto Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 Avianca had MD-83. However, the Maddog for FS9 only simulates the MD-82 HJG's AV MD's are all -83's (soon to be FDE upgraded) .... featuring all 3 AV liveries (by Camilo LUENGAS) .... with the exception of the Juan Valdez Coffee hybrid .... http://simviation.com/hjg/aircraft2/mcdonnelldouglas/md83/md-83_avianca_colombia_1992_83_ei-ceo.jpg http://simviation.com/hjg/aircraft2/mcdonnelldouglas/md83/md-83_avianca_colombia_2003_83_ei-ceo.jpg http://simviation.com/hjg/aircraft2/mcdonnelldouglas/md83/md-83_avianca_2010_83_hk-4591.jpg FS9 native (FDE, models, panels, sounds, and textures) FSX portable (FDE, models, and textures only) there are almost no differences between all the MD-80 models (-81, -82, -83 and -88) The primary difference between these MD models are their MGW .... and engine type an thrust ratings among some of them .... and the fact that a good number of MD 81 through -83 aircraft were modified with the MD-87/-88 type low-drag rear fuselage tail cone .... and some were also reconfigured with MD-87/-88/B717-200 type EFIS FD's too. MRC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmhariano Posted July 30, 2019 Author Share Posted July 30, 2019 HJG's AV MD's are all -83's (soon to be FDE upgraded) .... featuring all 3 AV liveries (by Camilo LUENGAS) .... with the exception of the Juan Valdez Coffee hybrid .... The primary difference between these MD models are their MGW .... and engine type an thrust ratings among some of them .... and the fact that a good number of MD 81 through -83 aircraft were modified with the MD-87/-88 type low-drag rear fuselage tail cone .... and some were also reconfigured with MD-87/-88/B717-200 type EFIS FD's too. Thank you Mark! I wasn't so off regarding differences then. I've been using a lot of HJG's offerings. I used to fly your MD for some time (with the Payne panels) until I got the Maddog for €15 (a bargain!). Maybe I'll have to play with the Maddog FDE to reflect the fuel and engine differences (I know no one will support this, but well). What FDE upgrades are expected for the HJG birds? PS: Please tell me you've tried the Juan Valdez coffee... Best regards, Luis Hernández Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aerofoto Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 Please tell me you've tried the Juan Valdez coffee "SI" senor .... es delicioso :) ... mucho mejor que STARBUCKS :( RE the MD FDE revision .... this's periodic thing we do every so often, but, one of the omprovements I particularly want to apply is in regard to rotation and T/O performances in relation to conrol input. MRC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now