Jump to content

aler

Registered Users
  • Posts

    68
  • Joined

Posts posted by aler

  1. Autoland is rarely used.

    Reason is it requires a lot of prior work and planning

    Pilots will prefer to do manual landings or ILS

    The autoland present in the sim is simplified. So between a fake autoland or a more close to reality RNAV, ILS or VFR land ....

    Besides not all airports are certified for autoland

     

    KORD is my hometown airport. Try ILS 28R. Many memories....

  2. Thanks for the info regarding the 787. I found out the same thing with the QualityWings 787 in FSX.

     

    But as far as being able to land via the A/P, this is only half the problem. The APPROACH on the 787 doesn't work either. This leads to funny problem. The 787 came down as per G/S, but it won't actually land. It touched the runway and up again. It's not the same behaviour as the QW787 in FSX.

     

    Still researching.

     

    A lot of work has still to be done in order to get a descent plane. In order to avoid the bouncing on the runway just disarm the A/T (A/T ARM) button at 500 feet. Happy flying

  3. You're right, I guess you'll just have to fly the default Xplane, FS9, FSX or P3D default aircraft that have all those systems simulated. Oh, wait...

     

    Come on...these are default aircraft; yet, they're miles ahead of any default aircraft released prior. Plus, they will be updated going forward. I guess you want all the systems included in a similar add-on aircraft that cost $130+? Heck, that one add-on cost 2.5x more than the default simulator.

     

    I am an X Plane aficionado, flying the ssg 748i costing less than half of $130 I paid for fs2020. But I will agree with you the fs2020 is just for people finding their houses in the sim....Thanks for your reply.

×
×
  • Create New...