ac103010
-
Posts
319 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
vBulletin Articles
News
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by ac103010
-
-
Hello Wim,
First, thank you for looking.
The double underscore is misleading. Sorry. That is a typo when I was typing the error message in ACA17.
There isn't a fault in the [fltsim.11] numbering.
Oddly, the aircraft is not showing as faulty in AIFP3 so I suppose it could be, and probably is, a fault with ACA17.
I will check whether the a/c actually shows up.
Thank you, once again.
Allan
-
This program is really useful - mostly. However, I'm having an issue I can't resolve. I ask it to "find errors" and there are 100's. But this is one example:
WoA_DJC__A319_CFM_IBE-Iberia_KBJ Aircraft in Flightplan not resent in FS (FSX) Traffic_000_WoA_Iberia_Su08.bgl
I've tried and tried different things to get rid of this, with no success.
These are the important details of the aircraft:
CFG File:
[fltsim.11]
title=WoA_DJC_A319_CFM_IBE-Iberia_KBJ
sim=DJC_A32X
model=cfm
sound=
texture=IBE-Iberia_KBJ
atc_id=EC-KBJ
atc_airline=Iberia
atc_flight_number=0450
atc_heavy=0
ui_manufacturer=Airbus
ui_type=A319-111
ui_variation=Iberia "LINCE IBERICO"
description=aia 737-300 v2
atc_parking_codes=IBE
atc_parking_types=GATE
soundai=
ui_typerole=Verkehrsflugzeug
ui_createdby=AI Aardvark,DJC
Title in bgl file:
AC#1001,485,"WoA_DJC_A319_CFM_IBE-Iberia_KBJ"
Texture:
texture.IBE-Iberia_KBJ
Part of Flightplan:
AC#1001,EC-KBJ,1%,Week,IFR,6/04:55:00,6/05:47:00,200,F,0432,LEBB,6/06:35:00,6/07:32:00,210,F,0435,LEMD,6/08:29:00,6/10:04:00,370,F,3704,GMMN,6/10:53:00,6/12:27:00,340,F,3703,LEMD,6/13:53:00,6/16:44:00,380,F,3548,EDDT,6/17:34:00,6/20:34:00,370,F,3547,LEMD,0/05:44:00,0/06:54:00,280,F,0746,LEBL,0/07:44:00,0/08:52:00,290,F,0945,LEMD
Can anyone see what the problem might be?
Many thanks.
Allan
-
Hi all.
I hope you all had a good Xmas. Happy New Year to everyone.
I haven't responded to advice on SDK, I've been too busy, but will try to sort it in the next few days.
Allan
-
Thank you Wim. That's a job for tomorrow. :)
-
They are in my Apps and Features. The Paths remained the same in my C Drive.
-
Checked. Mine was SP1A. Now installed SP2, so I have:
Microsoft Flight Simulator X SP2 SDK
Microsoft Flight Simulator X: Acceleration
Checked the dll.xml file. That hadn't changed. But still no TOOLS in FSX.
Allan
-
Hi CRJ.
I didn't think it mattered so long as the path is the same. However, I've edited it and added the X. I also edited the dll.xml file to reflect this. But still no joy. Not getting TOOLS in the strip menu.
Allan
-
Hello again.
Right, I've followed the instructions to the letter (or so I believe).
My Paths to the FSX Folders are:
C:\Microsoft Flight Simulator X
C:\Microsoft Flight Simulator SDK
Launch dll.xml False False Object Placement Tool False False C:\Microsoft Flight Simulator SDK\SDK\Mission Creation Kit\object_placement.dll Traffic Toolbox False False C:\Microsoft Flight Simulator SDK\SDK\Environment Kit\Traffic Toolbox SDK\traffictoolbox.dll Visual Effects Tool False False C:\Microsoft Flight Simulator SDK\SDK\Environment Kit\Special Effects SDK\visualfxtool.dll FSUIPC 4 False Modules\FSUIPC4.dll Saved the dll.xml file but still don't see TOOLS in the dropdown menu in FSX.
Any ideas?
-
Belay that question. I think I've sorted it. But going to bed, now and I'll edit it in the morning.
Allan
-
Hello again.
I've got to ...........roaming\microsoft\FSX and opened the dll.xml file. I have the same as you displayed abover except I have "True" as you suggest. But I cannot change anything in this file. Is there a procedure, I'm missing, for editing an XML file?
Allan
-
Hi.
I've not got a chance to do this tonight but thank you so much. I'll sort in in the morning.
Thanks again.
Allan
-
-
Hi.
Can anyone help me with this issue? I've installed both FSX and SDK on my C Drive. In SDK I can find the Traffic Toolbox SDK but it doesn't contain Traffic Settings, Traffic Explorer, etc. Why would that be?
Thank you,
Allan
-
Can anyone tell me, please, where the aircraft get the information to display above each aircraft in play?
And why is it often different from the information, ID, etc., in the aircraft.cfg file?
Thank you,
Allan
-
Slightly off trackbut from what I've seen of Win 11 (which, I admit, is precious little) I'll have to be dragged kicking and screaming to use it.
Allan
-
Yes, I did see the email address on the website.
Allan
-
-
I need some help with this program and have emailed AI Flight Support twice without a reply. So can anyone tell me where the program gets it's information from for:
1. Airport Timetables
2. The aircraft information that's displayed above the aircraft when it's active?
Or, can you tell me if there's an alternative contact email?
Many thanks
Allan
-
Sorry, should have updated this but been very busy.
Solved the problem. I had 26 textures installed and although I had texture=ABCD in my aircraft.cfg file I hadn't put "texture." in front ot each texture. So I had ABCD instead of texture.ABCD.
Thanks again.
Allan
-
Yes, can do, but I have a print on my PC of a timetable from another program. I just can't remember which one.
Allan
-
Hi.
I've been using ACA 2017, primarily to check timetables. However, it seems we can't print the timetables. Does anyone now how it can be done, or are there other programs that will create timetables which can be printed?
It appears the website cannot now be emailed.
Thank you.
Allan
-
Mr Zippy. I think I may have the solution but will take me a while to check it out. Probably come back to you tomorrow, now.
Allan
-
-
Hi all,
I've had this problem on a few occasions but never found a solution. Just installed some Aircraft but when I checked, ACA_2017 flagged up some texture errors. In addition, the aircraft concerned show up in black only.
On checking I find that the texture folders in each case contain only one file.
In this case they're AI Aardvark aircraft. I can't remember if this has always been the case when I've had problems in the past.
What to do? Any ideas?
Many thanks.
Allan
An issue using ACA_2017
in FSX General Discussion
Posted
Very possibly. But, at first sight it looked far more comprehensive. Of course, if it's gooing to be unreliable, as appears, then perhaps AIFP is the one.
Thank you both for your replies.