Jump to content

FS9.5 Never Had It so Good: Some Lifters


Recommended Posts

All over the world, in all kinds of weather...

 

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/910/BU39WE.jpg

 

Military and civilian, they eat up all that stuff...

 

 

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/909/Fws0wS.jpg

 

...and sometimes throw it out again...

 

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/673/qb9RAi.jpg

 

The temptation is to overload, and sometimes the performance is marginal:

 

 

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/673/Mzoygp.jpg

 

At other times, with an empty belly, they do remarkable airshow stuff:

 

 

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/661/6RHIep.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got 2 questions about that last shot. What airport is that? I am usually good at guessing the airport, but I can not put my finger on that one. Also which C-17 do you use?? I use the Area 51 model, but I have been thinking about switching to the Virtavia C-17.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments!

Joseph, that is Frankfurt EDDF, looking a little quiet because in my "military" sim, there is no civilian AI.

You're on the money, that is the Virtavia C-17.

I have all of them, but this is my favourite, because I paid something like NZD80 for it, and need to get value!

 

The pucker factor in fact increases somewhat, after you've lifted off, just over the piano keys...

I made a clip of this some time back; it rates as FS9.2 so doesn't really belong in here.

FRAPS also ate the framerates, so it doubly doesn't belong in here!

If you missed the pucker the first time, don't worry, the take off is seen again... and again.:pilot:

If you stay with the follower clips, edetroit is the master of FS9.5 IL76.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish there was a way I could compare the Area 51 C-17 with the Virtavia C-17. I do like the visual model of the Area 51 model, but the panel is looking a whole lot better on the Virtavia model. And I have no idea which model has the better flight dynamics.

 

I guess one day I will just go ahead and buy the Virtavia model then I will have both C-17 to compare them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THANKS! ;)

It is the Wilco model, I don't have many from that stable, but I thought this one pretty good.

 

Now, one cannot really have a Lifter thread without the grandmother of all Lifters, the Mriya.

It is really, really big.

 

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h200/CHARL_photos/A380B747.jpg

 

Look how heavy that wing: six engines...

 

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/673/qr1QV6.jpg

 

Then, when the air starts flowing, the flex... then the bite, and it's flying with wings spread.

 

 

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/540/wMIfOu.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Captain Sim... I was going to shoot some updated screens for this, but am currently without flightsim.

And the Jahn C-47, and an AN-24 ...aargh

 

You are lucky! About 5 or 6 years ago I got a new computer and went from XP to Windows 7. Since I went to Windows 7 I have not been able to install my Captain Sim C-130's (I have then all except for the float version). When I try to install the planes I get a error message (I forget what the message was). Then this past January I got the urge to fly this plane, so I tried to buy the KC-130 again think a new password would get the plane install, but it didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes me stick all the more fervently to my WIN XP box...

Here's the C-130, haven't used it in a while, as brilliant a model as I remembered it.

 

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/538/Z651J1.jpg

 

Can't be too many places in the world this bird has not been, everyone seems to own one.

 

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/673/kbbHaw.jpg

 

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/907/xFaGlQ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Thanks for trying to help, but I did everything suggested in that thread and it didn't help. The only thing I didn't do is a manual install, but that is because the installers I have don't give a opportunity to put in the install path. They must of changed the installers so you can't do a manual install.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...