Adamk99 Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 Hi, I recently purchased the IFly 747-400 for FSX:SE, and I'm finding the performance to be horrendous. Before I continue, my system is : FSX:SE Windows 7 64 bit 8GB Ram Intel I5 3330 Processor GTX 850 Graphics Card FSX settings are all modest, with traffic never higher than 50% but rarely do I exceed 20% at large airporpts I initially loaded up the a/c at UK2000 Heathrow to have a play around with it and check if everything does what it should. 5 minutes in I got an OOM. 5 minutes sat on a runway at EGLL. I tried again, this time loading up at Fly Tampa EHAM. After about 5 minutes, I moved to Manchester (UK2000) and I got OOM number 2 after about 10 minutes in game. I am used to being able to fly the PMDG 737 from EHAM to EGLL, taxiing to the Polderbaan runway (20 minutes on the ground at a detailed airport), fly over photo scenery and then ORBX England, landing at Heathow and using GSX at the gate just fine. Any help as to why the VAS usage appears so dreadful with the IFly would be greatly appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VAL747 Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 I have a higher spec system then yours and its the same..very frustrating and ifly are really no help and basically deny they have an issue..the way i resolved it is by making sure you dont run textures above 2096 preference 1048.. make sure your auto gen is set to normal and avoid using big airport scenery like flytampa ect..also if you are running Tex have your cloud textures low. Trust me i fel your frustration especially when I can run PMDG planes without going to extremes..and speaking of PMDG their 747 will be out soon..i always run Procep when using ifly 747 to make sure i have atleast 800 - 1gb after take off i usually land at my destination with approximately 200mb to spare. Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamk99 Posted December 31, 2016 Author Share Posted December 31, 2016 Thank you - I'm going to see if a refund is possible because £50 for this headache is wrong. The detail is okay and the window blinds are nice but it's useless if I can't even get it off the ground Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TseTse Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 The iFly 747 v2 is a known performance hog. As far as my experience goes, the following is a list of aircraft from best performance to worst performance: Default aircraft Carenado "Proline 21" airplanes (Cessna CJ2, Hawker 800XP, etc.) QW BAe 146 Aerosoft Airbus X PMDG Boeing 737NGX Carenado Phenom 100 PMDG Boeing 777 iFly Boeing 747-400 v2 TFDi Boeing 717 http://i.imgur.com/iMDlMAv.jpg TseTse i5-9600K @ 3.7~4.5GHz | RTX2060 Super 8GB | 32GB DDR4-3200 | 1TB Samsung 840EVO | Z390 Chipset | Windows 10 x64 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSMR Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 I use it in FS9 and run it long haul 3-4 times per week in max setttings and traffic. Works fine. So must be a sim issue. It does use a lot of resources because there is a lot going on in the background with it. They don't call them P3Dud and FSuX for nothing. :D https://fshub.io/airline/RUA/overview https://fshub.io/airline/KAP/overview Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.