stevecoop Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Hi I am considering buying the above for FS9. I only fly Airliners is it worth buying ? I have a lot of payware scenery is this a problem ? Thanks for any info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgf Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 UTE makes a more dramatic difference for VFR flights but its improvements are certainly noticeable even for high-and-fast IFR. The only issues you may find are sceneries designed for the default rivers and shores may not be positioned properly on UTEs corrected features (an office tower may be in a river, or a railroad track crosses a runway, etc.); in many cases, particularly payware, there are patches to correct this. Overall I'd say it is definitely worth it. In fact my major complaint with UT is that it is only available for Europe and North America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevecoop Posted August 28, 2015 Author Share Posted August 28, 2015 Thanks I will be buying it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pschlute Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Many payware airport sceneries have intall options that you should select if using UT. I would do a thorough search in the UT forums and the forums for your payware airports. You may find that a reinstall or a "repair" of your scenery would be of benefit after you install UT. It wont do any harm if you do not do this, but where the airport has has an option to blend in better with UT you might as well be taking advantage of it. I use UT Europe and am very happy I bought ti. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwillmot Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 Great product .... used it for years .... no conflicts with any of my add-on airports. Super happy with it and hope you will be too. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.