GKKnupper

@aerofoto

Hi,

you wrote:

"between AIR.FILE data and some panel gauges" .

Could you be PLEASE so kind and name me ONE plane as an example to TEST and UNDERSTAND

your statement of the problems an AIR file can have on a Panel or vice versa??

Thank you very much

G. Kirschstein

Hi,

[ATTACH=CONFIG]231696[/ATTACH]

curious why most of the TDS Boeings have CG way forward (see picture). This seems to cause unnatural down pitch after take off during climb. I did some tweeks in aircraft GFGs to alter this but only marginally. Actualy when I moved back static pitch in contact points too much, the aircraft fell on its tail.

But somehow I believe that TDS have a reson for this since most of their Boeings look like this?

 

Just curious if any clues.

@ Peter Bendl

Dear Sir,

please see line "wing_sweep"

[airplane_geometry]

wing_area = 1341

wing_span = 117.5

wing_root_chord = 25.8

wing_dihedral = 6.2

wing_incidence = 1

wing_twist = -0.5

oswald_efficiency_factor = 0.68

wing_winglets_flag = 1

wing_sweep = 0 //25

wing_pos_apex_lon = 15.0

wing_pos_apex_vert = 0

The "Problem" has to do with the WING Sweep and must be corrected accordingly and NOTHING else.

NO fussing with the CG , Contact Points .... in the CFG- or even ANYTHING in the AIR-file.

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

Hi,

[ATTACH=CONFIG]231696[/ATTACH]

curious why most of the TDS Boeings have CG way forward (see picture). This seems to cause unnatural down pitch after take off during climb. I did some tweeks in aircraft GFGs to alter this but only marginally. Actualy when I moved back static pitch in contact points too much, the aircraft fell on its tail.

But somehow I believe that TDS have a reson for this since most of their Boeings look like this?

 

Just curious if any clues.

@ Peter Bendl

Dear Sir,

please see line "wing_sweep"

[airplane_geometry]

wing_area = 1341

wing_span = 117.5

wing_root_chord = 25.8

wing_dihedral = 6.2

wing_incidence = 1

wing_twist = -0.5

oswald_efficiency_factor = 0.68

wing_winglets_flag = 1

wing_sweep = 0 //25

wing_pos_apex_lon = 15.0

wing_pos_apex_vert = 0

The "Problem" has to do with the WING Sweep and must be corrected accordingly and NOTHING else.

NO fussing with the CG , Contact Points .... in the CFG- or even ANYTHING in the AIR-file.

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

@ViperPilot2

Please see the line : wing_sweep

[airplane_geometry]

wing_area = 1341

wing_span = 117.5

wing_root_chord = 25.8

wing_dihedral = 6.2

wing_incidence = 1

wing_twist = -0.5

oswald_efficiency_factor = 0.68

wing_winglets_flag = 1

wing_sweep = 0 //25 !!! The CG Forward has to do with the Wing Sweep ... It must be OFFSET accordingly , NOTHING else

wing_pos_apex_lon = 15.0

wing_pos_apex_vert = 0

The TDS planes are excetionally WELL designed !!

Your comment:

"and move some TDS heavy Iron to the Boneyard." is NOT deserved for this very good designer.

Sincerely

G.Kirschstein

Hi,

[ATTACH=CONFIG]231696[/ATTACH]

curious why most of the TDS Boeings have CG way forward (see picture). This seems to cause unnatural down pitch after take off during climb. I did some tweeks in aircraft GFGs to alter this but only marginally. Actualy when I moved back static pitch in contact points too much, the aircraft fell on its tail.

But somehow I believe that TDS have a reson for this since most of their Boeings look like this?

 

Just curious if any clues.

@Peter Bendl

Please see the line : wing_sweep

[airplane_geometry]

wing_area = 1341

wing_span = 117.5

wing_root_chord = 25.8

wing_dihedral = 6.2

wing_incidence = 1

wing_twist = -0.5

oswald_efficiency_factor = 0.68

wing_winglets_flag = 1

wing_sweep = 0 //25 !!! The CG Forward has to do with the Wing Sweep ... It must be OFFSET accordingly , NOTHING else

wing_pos_apex_lon = 15.0

wing_pos_apex_vert = 0

Sincerely

G.Kirschstein

@ViperPilot2

Hi ,

IF you refer to heather Sherman who did a lot of repaints for many different planes, her favored color was a type of Maroone color.

I had contact with her for a long time and than .... silence.

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

@Connel

The second drive CONNECT to its own SATA Controller.

BUT much BETTER performance you will get IF you use 2 SSD.

1 for the OP-System

and the second one for ALL of your Flight Sims.

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

@ViperPilot2

Hi

The comment THEY made

"Some followers laughed, but many said that it's the perfect SIM for those that are either Hardware or Budget challenged, and for the Beginner because it'll run on just about any rig out there!"

Just let THEM do it !!

I bet most of THEM do NOT understand:

1. Computer HW / SW / OP-Systems

2. Do NOT understand the "REAL Internas" of a FS System

4. NEVER did any Improvement to FS9 (however they could ///)

3. Are NOT real Pilots at ALL

4. Are to dumb to walk in a straight line ..

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

Herr Leuenberger ,

die MITGELIEFERTE "name.BGL" file F U N K T I O N i e r t einwandfrei.

Diese hat weit

300 Flugplaene die aber als WEEKLY spezifiziert angelegt wurden./\

Erschwerend kommt hinzu das die "Bomber" WELTWEIT fliegen.

Zufaellig ist mein Heimatflughafen enthalten, durch Dis-Assembly der BGL file, konnte ich die "Bomber" in meiner FS9 Installation

ueberpruefen.

Die "Bomber" fliegen auch beim Pilotieren SEHR gut. !!!!!

Also nochmals, ALLES funktioniert KORREKT wie es der Author ausgefuehrt hat .

Das einzige was ich kritisiere ist das Er sich nicht die Muehe gab die BGL und die Anzahl der Flugplaene und den Typ er Flugplaene

NICHT beschrieben hat.

Aber sonst hat der "Simmer" eine sehr gute Arbeit geleistet.

Gruesse aus dem Paradies von

G. Kirschstein

P.S. Ich werde Sie in naechster Zeit belaestigen ABER nicht sofort da ich um mein linkes Augenlicht kaempfe um dieses nicht zu verlieren.

Das habe ich mir nach dem 3ten COVID Booster Shot eingefangen ... und dann hier dieses sehr "responsive" Health Care System

@skywest

Hi,

DID you check Sir that the file is stored in the FS9 Folder and NOT in the DLL folder ?

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

P.S. IF you would move on to the next "SIM" every time you encounter a problem ..........

Guten Tag Herr Leuenberger, Gruezzi .

Ich kann KEIN Problem feststellen !

Die "Bomber" sind ALLE, in den 5 Gruppen, als AI definiert , die haben keine Panel daran kann man es erkennen das diese NICHT Pilotierbare "Bomber" sind.

DARUM ist in der Airfile "SGAI_Falcon20.air" im Record 105 eine 2 zu sehen.

Aendern Sie dieses auf 0 und DANN koennen Sie den "Bomber" in FS9 unter

Aircraft

Select Aircraft

zum PILOTIEREN laden ABER ohne Panel .

Ich hoffe das hilft Ihnen weiter

Gruesse und Dank aus dem Paradies sendet Ihnen Herr Leuenberger

G. Kirschstein

P.S. Ich werde Sie ueber meine normale email anschreiben mit einer Frage meinerseits.

@Christopher Tarana

Dear Sir,

what are you "recommending" ??

You wasted 2 hours of my valuable time of stating this CRAP to me !!!

This is the lowest level of an so called FS!

From now on any of your "Contributions" will be disregarded by me.

What a recommendation OMG

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

@Christi

Send me the plane as a Zip file.

I will make you a set of new FDE files and she will fly as the specs design parameter are calling for.

Send it to

gkcherry11@t-online.de

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

@loki

Sir, Lady ...

YOU wrote:"

"had restrictions put on their accounts due to their behaviour"

My Question to you:

who decides ???

OMG what kind of clientel are lately present.

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

@Skywatcher12

Dear Sir, Mr. Mark Daniels!

You wrote:

“Goodbye to the members in this forum. My posts are now under moderation and I have no interest in staying anywhere where I have such restrictions. All the best to all and long live FS9!”

I’m sorry, but I do NOT understand these parts of your sentence:

1. My posts are now under moderation

2. where I have such restrictions

Are you trying to convey that “THIS” entity Flightsim.com, is acting like these CRIMINEL Social Media Outfits like Facebook, TWITTER and the rest of this crap ??

Please reply to my email address, I believe you should still have it because I sent you some files before, but here we go.

Gkcherry11@t-online.de

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

@jskorna

are you joking or try to pull our legs ???

OMG incompetence all over ... BUT a lot of it !

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

@neilking2706

sent me your aircraft.CFG file.

I fix it for you.

Pls send it to gkcherry11@Comcast.net

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

@UPHILL3

I do ..

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

@skywatcher12

Sir,

sorry but your statement " nothing else to do just fly" is almost correct BUT there are still major problems in FS9.

The "ERROR Handler" is theeeeee worst one I have ever encountered in my IT carrier within the last sixty (60) years

in SW Development !!!

Furthermore it is really ridiculous that at FS Start UP time this expert for the EFFECTS did this unbelievable unnecessary work which complicates debugging of some planes almost impossible ....

NO design walk through was performed in this area alone, besides the horrible ERROR Handler, which shows that the Finance and Sales experts forced an INCOMPLETE product into the market.

After FS9 , for these obvious reasons, I was NOT willing to debug FSX and spent any money on ANY of these products from MS Gates anymore.

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

@skywatcher12

Don't worry about those IQ loaded experts ...

They do not know what Flightsimulator means, they are looking for "Look how nice I look" and nothig else.

I answered to 2 gentlemen and I hope the reply gets to them ...

IF I would have the chance to discuss face to face with them why after Windows XP any other MS Crap was produced

they would "exactly" know why ...

Why FSX did NOT fix any of the remaining FS9 problems THESE experts might know as well .....

I do not care what anybody else is using, Windows Crap or FS version, but these so called experts try to force THEIR opinion upon other HAPPY Simmers which might know a little bit more about System HW / SW / Firmware / OP-Systems

Application Designs and implementations of all of these subjects.

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

@kevinfolsom

sir,

I forgive you BECAUSE you do not know what you are talking !!!

Because I have my friendly day otherwise I would take the liberty to tell you the truth about your IT knowledge.

You must be one of the persons who likes looks over substance !!

OMG

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

@CTarana45

sir,

you are QUITE wrong about fs2004 bugs.

I submitted 83 bugs to the "gods responsible for this product" alone ...

never got any replay.

that was the reason I never went to FSX because the did not EVEN bother to look at the still existing problems FS9 had.

IF these "gods" would even had considered considered to fix some of them than all the following .... PRODUCTS were not have been needed.

I never understood why the FSX team did not look at the existing problems of FS9 ..

Now reading about the "NEW" wonderful product confirms my take on MS , including this Windows Crap following Windows XP, confirms my thoughts .... Software Incompetent developers ... MR. Gates at the helm ...

I still use XP and FS9 because I was and still not being willing to DEBUG for a second time Gates SW Crap !!!

sincerely

g. kirschstein

hi,

I'm confused, do NOT understand what are you trying to do !!

Just RECONFIGURE the Heli to FLY it as a Helicopter, IF it flies than see whether you can select the different Textures AND THAN create your files for AI !!

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

P.S. I just peeked at it and the Heli does NOT fly at ALL !

Mister "Switzerland ",

how can anybody be interested IF he has never heard, see off the plane ????!!!

After people were trying to help, EVEN without success, it should be a curtesy to inform the rest of us deplorables, some persons might like this plane ...

Thank you very much.

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein

Hi,

"Meanwhile I got a very useful help and the aircraft. Many thanks hanks to the attentive reader and member!"

I STRONGLY believe that MORE info, as feedback, should be given to the rest of us ... deplorable s !!

Thank you very much.

Sincerely

G. Kirschstein