If a JPEG is blurry, it is because of the quality it was saved in, not the format. If JPEGs were as bad as indicated, it wouldn't be the standard format for digital cameras.
In my humble opinion, I would say yes and no.
It depends what segment of the market you are directing your comment to: Those who want to take pictures, or those who are interested in taking photographs, and taking an interest in the hobby, and furthering the development of their skills. I think it is along those two divergent groups that those two standards, JPEG/JPG and RAW, can peacefully co-exist.
To the point of a blurry JPEGs:
loki be right; but not entirely in my opinion. It may be the quality the JPG was saved in, like loki says. However, the argument - for lack of a better word - could be made, that, even if you saved the JPG at it's highest quality, and did, lots and lots of saves, eventually, if you did it enough times, - saves that is - the image would become blurry. Bear in mind that the JPG/JPEG format is a lossy format, as described above.
How do you keep FSX interesting?
in FSX General Discussion
Posted
In my humble opinion, I would say yes and no.
It depends what segment of the market you are directing your comment to: Those who want to take pictures, or those who are interested in taking photographs, and taking an interest in the hobby, and furthering the development of their skills. I think it is along those two divergent groups that those two standards, JPEG/JPG and RAW, can peacefully co-exist.
To the point of a blurry JPEGs:
loki be right; but not entirely in my opinion. It may be the quality the JPG was saved in, like loki says. However, the argument - for lack of a better word - could be made, that, even if you saved the JPG at it's highest quality, and did, lots and lots of saves, eventually, if you did it enough times, - saves that is - the image would become blurry. Bear in mind that the JPG/JPEG format is a lossy format, as described above.
No_Inflight_Meal?