Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Does FSW have better standard scenery than FSX or X-Plane?

  1. #11
    lavochkin Guest

    Default

    FSW has a long way to go. I am excited to see the final product. I bought it and have set on off the side to see where is goes. I did not like the scenery, but I used the sim when it first come out for 5 hours and have not used it since. Waiting.

  2. #12

    Default

    I feel XPlane 11 is the leader here when it comes to this. Its scenery looks just fantastic right out of the box. Its so good that Im not even going to bother with any 3rd party stuff. To get my FSX looking that good I had to get the Orbx global addon.
    i7 920 @ 3.00Ghz // GTX 1060 6GB // 12GB DDR3 // Win10 Pro

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1999
    Location
    Warren, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    12,360

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Throttle_Up View Post
    I feel XPlane 11 is the leader here when it comes to this. Its scenery looks just fantastic right out of the box. Its so good that Im not even going to bother with any 3rd party stuff. To get my FSX looking that good I had to get the Orbx global addon.
    Can you give me a screen shot of the Detroit city skyline please?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 50
    Last Post: 03-03-2016, 11:16 PM
  2. Aircraft using custom Luas rather than standard FSX variables
    By 694B32 in forum Air Manager Support
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-27-2015, 10:30 AM
  3. X-plane looks much better than P3d and FSX!
    By 757 Fanatic in forum X-Plane
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 05-17-2015, 05:50 PM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-29-2002, 03:26 AM
  5. New FSW Member and New FSW Metar Product
    By Chris_ in forum FS2002
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-20-2002, 11:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •