Jump to content

Hunonymous

Registered Users
  • Posts

    65
  • Joined

Hunonymous's Achievements

Community Guru

Community Guru (4/7)

  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

10

Reputation

  1. hey seems like i fixed it the problem seemed because my max/static compression was wrong i played with it a little and got to understand and used the formulas in the pdf you sent seems like everything is working fine now thanks for the help
  2. no by autobrake i mean the brakes really they will engage in whatever setting they are at RTO 1, 2 or 3 i'm using the payware lds 767 also do you know what damping ratio (in the contact points) does? and can u give me some examples?
  3. i think so but now i'm having a problem with the autobrake not deploying, it deploys on touchdown but stops working 3 seconds later do you know anything i could do? great it seems like autobrake doesnt work if there is more than 3 contact points for landing gear :( ill have to look for something
  4. i think i fixed it by just copying and pasting the gear contact points so there is 2 contact points for the 1 landing gear in the same position and that seemed to make the plane more resistant to sinking because of additional weight which fixed my problem where with the plane fully loaded the plane would sink and with a bit of fuel the plane would float on the runway and i also had to increase static compression a bit
  5. I got this 767 addon and i'm trying to make the landing gear tilt perfectly into the runway so i lowered the gear contact points and increased static compression so it doesn't float when fully compressed but when i increase the fuel to 100% the gear wheels sink into the runway when fully compressed and this would not happen with the default contact points is there anyway i can make the gear not to sink so much when adding more weight?
  6. Also i bought the Flight1 Super 80 Pro and it's fantastic, very well detailed in sounds, systems and visually and it is very light on FPS loved it
  7. Thanks for the response i'll definetely look on the VC10 and Tristar, also do you know any 747 that is light on frames?
  8. Sir i'm no newbie i know what is IAS, GS or TAS the problem is the default 737 if i set mach 0.8 at an altitude where my IAS is 280 knots and i climb for a higher altitude i'll end with my speed at mach 0.82 at 280 knots, it's just MS was too lazy to make it realistic or fix its issues
  9. did you get it to work? if not have you checked that the security settings in the fs9 executable are set to allow and not deny?
  10. Sorry for late answer but the default 737 mach speed is glitchy see, if i set it mach 0.78 or climb or descend the speed wil become incorrect that's why i just use KIAS
  11. see i was having that problem fsx freezing each 5 seconds but i turns out the graphics cache causes the graphics to glitch and freeze the sim i fixed this by going on appdata\microsoft\fsx and deleting the shaders folder also check if your system parts are overheating
  12. see i was having that problem fsx freezing each 5 seconds but i turns out the graphics cache causes the graphics to glitch and freeze the sim i fixed this by going on appdata\microsoft\fsx and deleting the shaders folder also check if your system parts are overheating
  13. what products can you recommend me which you have? i'm looking for something that is no less realistic than the level-d but also that doesn't kill my fps and just flight sells more of classic aircraft
  14. i think you mean stuttering try to go to appdata\microsoft\fsx and delete the folder shaders in there and see if it helps
  15. Bought the LVL-D 767 and it is very realistic and runs on any machine, and would like to know if anyone knows some others FPS friendly jets from medium to large that dont kill fps like pmdg or aerosoft
×
×
  • Create New...