• Canarsie!

    Final Argosy Four - Fini Flight

    By Tony Vallillo (27 September 2010)

    Final Argosy Four - Fini Flight

    Airline flying is supposed to be uneventful, one might even say boring. Maneuvers that make a pilot's heart beat a bit faster with sheer enjoyment might stimulate a cardiac infarction in a passenger! So airline pilots, at least, have to seek fulfillment in the more cerebral elements of flying, like ILS approaches in low visibilities in rain or snow at night! Occasionally, however, a legitimate procedure comes along that brings with it the spice of an extra challenge or two. There are fewer and fewer of these in the modern world of commercial aviation, as the industry seeks to corral all flying into an ever more standardized mold. But there are a number of places in the world where, for one operational reason or another, the standard mold just doesn't fit.

    Perhaps the most infamous of these oddball procedures has now been relegated to the world of flight simulation. The so-called "checkerboard" approach into the old Kai Tak airport in Hong Kong was one of the more hair-raising ways to land an airplane, and probably the most challenging approach flown in the really big jets, like the 747. Personally, I've never flown it, and I really don't regret the loss. I imagine that most, if not all, professional airmen are at least secretly relieved at the demise of Kai Tak.

    The modern approach plate for the Canarsie Approach Approaching ASALT. On this occasion we had a jumpseat rider who agreed to double as crew photographer!

    Other somewhat less dramatic approaches still exist. The river visual approach to 18 at DCA comes to mind, as does the Expressway visual to 31 at LGA. But the approach most people are at least mildly familiar with is the famous Canarsie approach at JFK.

    If you look in the Jepps, you will find no procedure named "Canarsie", but you will find a VOR 13L/R approach. The term "Canarsie" crept in over the years in the vernacular of the airmen, no doubt because of the name of the VOR that forms the basis of the approach.

    This approach is something of a unique animal in the world of aviation. It is neither a circling approach nor, strictly speaking, a straight-in approach. For all practical purposes, it is a charted visual approach with less than VFR minimums. Just as in any VOR approach, you follow a course until you come to a point and altitude at which you must see something to proceed farther. In this case, however, what you see is not the runway (at least not at minimum visibility!), but a string of lead-in lights that draw you around for almost three miles to the runway.

    The idea for what came to be known as the Canarsie Approach originated at American Airlines shortly after the first Boeing 707's began operating at Idlewild (IDL). In those days, when the winds were such as to require the use of the 13's (which generally meant fairly strong out of the south or southeast) the accepted procedure was to fly the ILS approach to runway 04R, and circle the long way around to runway 13L. This involved leveling off on the 04R localizer at circling minimums, usually around 800 feet or so agl, flying across the airport right above 04R, and then making a left turn to a left downwind leg for 13L. At the appropriate time another series of left turns was commenced that would, in due course, lead the big jet to the final approach.

    Overall, this involved about 270 degrees of heading change in at least two and usually three turning maneuvers, at low altitude, often in conditions of marginal visibility, in an airplane that, at that time, even the Captain was relatively unfamiliar with. Actually, we should say especially the Captain, because most of the very senior Captains who were bidding the left seats of these new birds had started out in open cockpits! The 707 was their first exposure to the high speeds and sluggish responses of the early jets. The copilots, on the other hand, might possibly have had some prior experience in a jet bomber or fighter in the military, and often had a better grasp of jet operations than the old man did!

    Circling approaches like this in jet airplanes have always been something of a dicey proposition at best, and they are actually frowned upon or outright forbidden today. In 1958 they were more common, but problems became apparent almost as soon as the 707's and DC-8's began flying the pattern. Any circling approach is actually a visual maneuver, albeit performed most often in less than VFR conditions, and requires positive and continuous visual contact with the airport for safe completion. At the speeds the 707 was flying, it was extremely difficult to remain close enough to the airport to keep the landing runway in sight. The jets usually wound up quite a bit farther from the runway than did the DC-7 or Constellation, and several of them actually got dangerously low while trying to keep the airport in sight off to the left.

    There was also another factor that reared its head, a largely political factor -- Noise. The early 707's were as noisy as the later Concorde, and they spread this noise over a large area because of their speed. And, if noise alone were not enough, these birds spewed out vast quantities of greasy black smoke at the high power settings required to maintain altitude while configured for landing. The residents of the relatively well-to-do areas to the north and northeast of IDL were not long in launching protest after protest to their political minions!

    The airlines and the FAA began to cast about for a way to satisfy both the political noise problem and the safety problem inherent in the circling approach. At that time, American Airlines had a man at LGA by the name of Frank Cirino, with the title Manager Air Traffic Control. His job was to work with the FAA, the Port Authority that ran the airports, and the other airlines to ensure that air traffic control was both safe and efficient, in the interest of his employer. (AA to this day maintains a staff dedicated to this purpose, and over the years has managed to have a considerable positive influence on the shape and effectiveness of the air traffic system in the United States.) Cirino, a pilot himself, had been working on noise issues involving the new jets with a former AA pilot named Lou Achitoff, who by then worked for the Port Authority. These two men first came up with the notion of using the Belt Parkway as a visual aid for an approach to runway 13L.

    The Belt Parkway, which was built between the wars, follows the shore of Jamaica Bay from just east of Coney Island to the vicinity of the airport. It is six lanes wide, and hard to miss even in reduced visibility. And, importantly, the area in the vicinity of the Belt was nowhere near as developed in 1958 as it is today. Here seemed to be the answer to both the noise problem and the safety problem!

    Nothing in New York gets done quickly, of course, and it took nearly two years of studies, coordination, negotiation, and demonstration to get things worked out. Cirino and his former boss at AA, Captain Sam Saint, approached the legendary Captain Walt Braznell, AA's Director of Operations, about test flights using an AA 707. This was eventually approved and several flights were made in VFR conditions to prove that a 707 could, in fact, fly along the Belt Parkway and land on 13L. Cirino and Saint discovered that no more than 15 degrees of bank was required to make the turn onto final.

    While the tests were underway, Achitoff was convincing the highway department to improve the street lighting on the Parkway itself. This was eventually done, and is still in place today to the benefit of both pilots and drivers! Simultaneously, Cirino and Achitoff conceived the system of lead-in lights that was, after considerable negotiating with the city, eventually built and is also still in use today. Three sets of sequenced flashers guide aircraft around the northern edge of the bay and right over the JFK Hotel.

    As we approach Canarsie, the borough of Brooklyn, known to New Yorkers also as Kings County, lies off to the left. Aqueduct racetrack is off to the left, out of the picture, as JFK approaches ahead. One of the problems in cockpit photography with automatic cameras is the annoying tendency to focus on something inside, rather than on the scenery outside! At least I had a fairly recent haircut on this particular day!

    When the approach was approved and put into use, the minimums were set at 1500 feet ceiling and 3 miles visibility. After a few years of successful operations, the minima were gradually reduced to today's 800 feet ceiling and two miles visibility. The total degrees of direction change for the entire approach from Canarsie is around 90 degrees, and this occurs over a distance of more than 5 miles. The final turn from Aqueduct Racetrack to the runway is only around 45 degrees of heading change, and rarely requires more than 15 degrees of bank unless the winds are gale force or the pilot starts the turn a bit late! Contrast this with a series of 90 degree turns performed at low altitude with no outstanding visual references over neighborhoods that all look the same. Small wonder that the Canarsie approach has achieved such universal acceptance over the years. It is especially useful, as an air traffic tool, in the case of arrivals from the south and southeast over CAMRN. Sometimes it will be used in conjunction with the VOR/DME 22L, which would be in use for arrivals from the east. This is possible because runways 13L and 22L at JFK do not intersect, allowing for simultaneous operations and a great deal of flexibility. Arrivals from the south via the Canarsie and from the east via 22L are both relatively straight shots, with little or no out-of-the-way maneuvering - a big benefit to the users!

    Any pilot who flies into JFK regularly has flown this approach many times. The approach itself usually begins over ASALT, although on rare occasions one can be vectored to CRI itself. ASALT is crossed at 3000 feet, and then a descent begins so as to cross CRI right on 1500 feet. ASALT is 6 nm from CRI, so the descent need not be terribly precipitous. Unless there is a considerable tailwind, 600-700 feet per minute will do nicely.

    In VMC without anyone between you and the airport you could stay clean until CRI itself, at a speed of somewhere around 200-220 knots. There is enough time after CRI to configure, although doing so in real IMC conditions would put a considerable strain on both pilots, as things begin to happen very quickly!

    After CRI is crossed, a descent can commence to the minimum altitude of 800 feet. In VMC conditions (and for purposes of this discussion VMC means that you already had the airport in sight at ASALT!) an immediate descent just after CRI is not necessary - after all, you have almost 6 miles to lose 1500 feet. A normal descent (around 600-700 feet per minute) need not commence until a mile or two past CRI. This will prevent level flight with gear and a lot of flaps, and keep things quieter on the ground! After all, as I indicated above, the area along the Belt Parkway has gotten a great deal more crowded in the past 45 years!

    Once you arrive at the Belt parkway, just turn right and follow it, keeping it just off to the left. This is easier for the Captain to do, since it is right out his window! Aside from the parkway itself, Aqueduct racetrack is the principal landmark on the approach, and you normally plan to pass just to the south of it as the final turn begins toward the runway, now off to the right. The VASI's on the right side of 13L are conveniently aimed not down the localizer, but off to the west, and you can see them clearly from Aqueduct. They will provide vertical guidance from there on in. On a purely visual approach, with a constant descent from CRI, you'd want to be just below 1000 feet as you pass the racetrack, and fully configured for landing.

    Now straightened out on short final, coming up on the 150th street entry road. This is where the winds will start to get squirrely, if they are going to. Note that a large bug has just paid with his life for trying to occupy the same airspace as a 767!! Just about to touch down on 13L. Notice that you can only see one set of VASI's, on the left side. There is another set on the right, but that set is aimed off toward the race track and the middle of the approach path.

    As you cross the hotel, the roof of which hosts the last string of lead-in lights, you will be rolling out on final. The runway itself has a regular approach light system, which is now the main visual aid, along with the left-side VASI's, which are aligned along the straight-in final.

    In IMC, which is to say less than 1000 and 3, it is a good idea to be at least partially configured crossing ASALT, probably flaps 5 or 15 on a 767 and around 180 knots. At CRI you would want to have the gear down and flaps around 20 on a 767. After CRI you would want to descend right away, to get below the clouds and see the lead-in lights as soon as possible. Leveling at 800 feet at or prior to DMYHL, you must then maintain altitude until beyond Aqueduct, at which point you will have the runway and more importantly the VASI in sight. With the minimum visibility of two miles you will see two strings of lead-in lights at any given moment beyond DMYHL, in addition to the parkway itself, and following them around to the hotel is not terribly demanding.

    Once past the hotel, strange things can happen with the winds! There are many large hangars on both sides of the runway and on the south side of the final approach course. In the southerly wind conditions that favor using this approach, these buildings can create some interesting wind currents that affect the final 400 feet of the descent over roughly the last 3/4 mile of the approach, including the touchdown zone of 13L. It is not uncommon to encounter turbulence in the lee of the hangars. With a strong south wind, say around 15-20 knots, I have seen the wind actually rebound from the hangars on the left side of the runway, creating a left crosswind in the touchdown zone, which can come as a shock after having struggled with a right crosswind for the previous mile of the approach! These squirrelly winds lead to some interesting gyrations in the flare, and overall it will suffice to say that this runway does not play host to the really best landings at JFK!!

    It is possible to land on 13R from the Canarsie approach, and this is often done by airlines whose terminals lie on the southwest side of the field. The turn to 13R is a little tighter than for the left side, but not alarmingly so, and can be done easily in the real airplane with no more than 25 degrees of bank or so. The reason for this is that the landing threshold of 13R is several thousand feet down the pavement, so you are not actually aiming for the end of the concrete!

    Touchdown! Must have been a pretty smooth one, since the picture is fairly sharp!!

    Since our terminal is closer to 13L, I hardly ever used 13R. One of the several times in my career that I did so was at the end of my line requalification after returning to the airline from a 10 month stint of military active duty during Desert Storm. It was night, and the weather was good - good enough for us to see that the 747 that had been cleared for takeoff on 13R (which is always the primary departure runway) had been quite slow to commence his takeoff roll. As we rolled out on final approach (around 1 mile from the runway itself) he finally began to pick up speed. Since the first 2000 feet of this runway is off limits for landing, we were flying right through his turbulent exhaust, which made control a bit of a physical exercise! In addition, because it is verboten, except in an emergency, to actually touch down on a piece of concrete currently occupied by another set of tires, I had to hold us off the runway until he actually got airborne. In other circumstances, a go-around would have been in order, but the check airman agreed with my hastily verbalized assessment that to go belly-up to an airplane whose assigned heading was unknown to us would be more risky. Better to keep him in sight. With almost 15,000 feet of runway in play, it was really no problem -- just a matter of keeping us about 3 feet in the air until he broke ground! Just another night at the office! And lo and behold, with all of that practice in the flare, the landing was exceptionally smooth!! Well, you know what they say about that blind squirrel!

    All in all, I'm glad I got to fly in this current era. Before too long, the Canarsie approach will have some sort of 3 dimensional GPS overlay, with both lateral and vertical guidance. Safer, perhaps, but much less gratifying. The new generation of pilots will likely couple up the magic, and let Otto do all the work, never realizing that he is also having all of the fun. Too bad! They may not know what they will be missing!

    Happy Landings!

    Anthony Vallillo
    [email protected]

    Read previous articles from Tony Vallillo:
    Short Haul
    Final Argosy - Fini Flight
    Final Argosy 3 - The Mercury
    Final Argosy 2 - Last Tango In Paris
    Final Argosy - Under The Southern Cross
    Final Argosy


  • Recent Forum Activity

    Downwind66

    TDS Aircraft downloads, having trouble with Auto Spoilers not deploying?

    Thread Starter: Downwind66

    This has been a "head scratcher' for me for a long time. Boeing 787-8 aircraft auto spoilers refused to deploy. Works fine manually! I read in...

    Last Post By: Downwind66 Today, 07:30 AM Go to last post
    azzaro

    Portlandia

    Thread Starter: azzaro

    Starks Twin Oaks to Portland International via downtown. I hate to admit it but the Virus has become my new favorite plane. Probably the wrong time...

    Last Post By: DAVIDSTRAKA Today, 06:22 AM Go to last post
    sky44

    Beautiful World Scenery Game

    Thread Starter: sky44

    When FSX was born it had many bugs, most of them were hardware related, and if you had an office type PC you would suffer for months. But if you had...

    Last Post By: stinger2k2 Today, 06:20 AM Go to last post
    Stevepariser

    Where is my premium delux ac I had before?

    Thread Starter: Stevepariser

    After using the complete program for about a month I received the famous ERROR message. Unable to communicate with the content servers. Out of action...

    Last Post By: stinger2k2 Today, 04:18 AM Go to last post