• Interview: Gottfried Razek and Joop Mak BlueSkyScenery

    In what ways do you see development changing in the future?

    We both hope that future flight simulators remain open so that everyone who wants to, can provide content to enhance its appeal. There is always the danger of closed systems where only payware exists, and that would be a very bad thing for our community. Joop and I agree, that Lockheed Martin is doing a really great job on improving P3D and we both very much hope that they are successful with their product.

    The future of P3D does look very promising. What features would you like to see included in possible P3D releases?

    Mostly improvements on the flight model. Although I have no real world flight experience myself, I have sometimes read what real world pilots have said. Because of this, I think there is great potential for improvement, especially in regards to helicopters and aerobatic aircraft, or where an aircraft is performing at the edge of its flight envelope.

    We could also use a multiplayer weather model where everyone experiences the same weather environment. This would be cool for multiplayer flying: "request 20 degrees right turn to avoid..."

    I forgot to mention, that I sometimes fly on VATSIM and enjoy all kinds of scenarios; IFR with jets, VFR with light aircraft and helicopters or a fast leap with a military jet.

           

    Your Thoughts

    What can sites like FlighSim.Com do to support you and the hobby better?

    Sites like FlightSim.com do a great job. It is a great place for coming together, getting all kinds of information and spreading freeware. Currently I really have no idea what you or similar sites could do better. Talking of support, we would really like to take this opportunity to thank all the generous people who support our project or provide download bandwidth (which is never free). Without them we would not be able to deliver terrabytes of scenery each month.

    Gottfried, how do you and Joop feel about the future of flight simulation in general?

    I think the answer from both of us would be generally positive. We hope that enough young people stay/get interested in flight simming so as to appreciate the differences between the rich world of flight simulation and flying games. We also hope that the flight simulator user-base continues to grow so that it can be developed further, and to provide us with even more realism.

    What are some of the most important things a site or community can do to help developers such as yourself?

    We think the most important thing is that they enable us to keep in contact with our users by collecting comments and wishes, and keeping us informed.

    What would you like people to know about you or your team and work?

    What we would like people to know about us, is that we get great satisfaction and fun creating sceneries for others to enjoy. As long as we continue to have fun, we will make new sceneries. There is so much great landscape out there, and we have so little time to cover it all.

    All the best.

    Gottfried and Joop!
    BlueSkyScenery:
    http://www.blueskyscenery.com

    Download Blue Sky Scenery


    28 Comments
    1. Carob's Avatar
      Carob -
      I would be interested to know how people use their photo real sceneries. On what probably is an "average" system I tried to put together the majority of California and the computer and after about 5 minutes the computer could no longer render any of it and things were not useable. Refreshing the scenery made things work for about 20 seconds and then right back to everything being blurry. I was expecting things to work much better.
    1. fsxar177's Avatar
      fsxar177 -
      Sounds like you need a computer, my friend.

      I have used them for years, excellent performance - average system.
    1. Carob's Avatar
      Carob -
      Even the versions for FS9 that came out quite some time ago are system killers. I don't know who people ran them with the system that were out at that time.

      The system I was playing with these on is a Core2 Duo 3 Ghz with 6GB of RAM running Win7 64-bit with a GTX750 video card. I would think that should be plenty to run FS9 with the BlueSky stuff. But it's not.
    1. W33's Avatar
      W33 -
      Quote Originally Posted by Carob View Post
      Even the versions for FS9 that came out quite some time ago are system killers. I don't know who people ran them with the system that were out at that time.

      The system I was playing with these on is a Core2 Duo 3 Ghz with 6GB of RAM running Win7 64-bit with a GTX750 video card. I would think that should be plenty to run FS9 with the BlueSky stuff. But it's not.
      Let's first congratulate this team on the outstanding gift they have given to the community! Wonderful work and my thanks to you both. To often thanks is missing from users comments!

      Carob; it looks like you might have something wrong with your system as I've never had any problems running any of their fantastic sceneries. This is with a machine that is less powerful than your own.

      Thanks again for the interview.
    1. Carob's Avatar
      Carob -
      Carob; it looks like you might have something wrong with your system as I've never had any problems running any of their fantastic sceneries. This is with a machine that is less powerful than your own.

      Well I'd like some help figuring that out then as everything else is working just fine.
    1. modelr's Avatar
      modelr -
      Carob, sounds like you might have a video card getting hot.

      Also, are you running other programs at the same time? At just 3GHz, and two cores, you could be overwhelming the processor also, especially if you are having this happen at lower altitudes and fast aircraft. (100knots or faster.) Photo scenery uses a LOT of processing. Try flying at higher altitudes, above 3000ft AGL.

      My older machine did that at lower altitudes until I updated to a 4GHz multiple core (8 in my case, AMD) processor. And added extra cooling to the video card. Makes a huge difference.

      I also want to thank Gottfried and Joop for their sceneries. I use quite a bit of Bluesky Sceneries.
    1. marcori's Avatar
      marcori -
      I have not enough words to thank Gottfried and Joop for their outstanding work.
      I download all their sceneries and all them are loaded into my FSX (in a dedicated hard disk) and I never had any kind of problem, even with my older and less performing machines.
      Great job guys !!
    1. 3955's Avatar
      3955 -
      Gottfried, Joop,
      Superb work guys. Many thanks.
    1. jibrady's Avatar
      jibrady -
      I too have download almost all their scenery. It is outstanding! As mentioned in the interview, the work they put into color matching/balancing is what really makes their work so impressive. I always look forward to obtaining more scenery from them. If you have not tried their scenery than your really missing out!
      Jim
    1. phjoop's Avatar
      phjoop -
      Thanks for your comments, guys. We appreciate it very much.
      Joop
      BlueSkyScenery
    1. scottharmes6's Avatar
      scottharmes6 -
      I am also a very grateful and satisfied user of BlueSky scenery. It offers the most realistic flying experience, and there is nothing like flying over what the world really looks like. I am currently developing some photo scenery of my own, some of which is in Arizona around the Meteor Crater, and I am trying to match the colours with the adjacent Bluesky scenery. You guys are probably also working on it, but hey, if you beat me I don't care, because yours will definitely be the best. I have even made my areas the same size as yours so they will fit next to the AZ_North3, 4 and 5. I also made a 1m mesh for the crater area from elevation data from www.opentopography.org. This was all inspired by your brilliant work, so thanks again.
      Cheers, Scott
    1. Carob's Avatar
      Carob -
      Quote Originally Posted by modelr View Post
      Carob, sounds like you might have a video card getting hot.

      Also, are you running other programs at the same time? At just 3GHz, and two cores, you could be overwhelming the processor also, especially if you are having this happen at lower altitudes and fast aircraft. (100knots or faster.) Photo scenery uses a LOT of processing. Try flying at higher altitudes, above 3000ft AGL.

      My older machine did that at lower altitudes until I updated to a 4GHz multiple core (8 in my case, AMD) processor. And added extra cooling to the video card. Makes a huge difference.

      I also want to thank Gottfried and Joop for their sceneries. I use quite a bit of Bluesky Sceneries.
      Nothing else running and above 20,000. No way card is getting hot.
    1. DominicS's Avatar
      DominicS -
      Quote Originally Posted by Carob View Post
      Nothing else running and above 20,000. No way card is getting hot.
      Carob, please do not use the comment box here for support.

      If you require help, then please use the appropriate forums.

      Regards

      Dominic
    1. Carob's Avatar
      Carob -
      Tried to get help from BlueSky but got nowhere.
    1. scottharmes6's Avatar
      scottharmes6 -
      5 out of 14 comments are you complaining about a FREEWARE scenery. If you do not like it or it doesn't run well on your system, then uninstall it. Problem solved.
    1. gtrbarbarian's Avatar
      gtrbarbarian -
      Hi ...what ever happened to your Colorado scenery it was great, and I had it stored on a hard drive that went corrupt....I'd love to download those again!
    1. Airmail's Avatar
      Airmail -
      GREAT work.

      I'm too old to get out there and see it for real, but you guys bring that area to life for me.



      Carob, there are thousands using their software without any problem. These guys aren't getting rich by giving away exceptionally good software - FOR FREE!

      Start learning a little and stop expecting others to solve your problems.
    1. darrinward777's Avatar
      darrinward777 -
      Quote Originally Posted by Carob View Post
      I would be interested to know how people use their photo real sceneries. On what probably is an "average" system I tried to put together the majority of California and the computer and after about 5 minutes the computer could no longer render any of it and things were not useable. Refreshing the scenery made things work for about 20 seconds and then right back to everything being blurry. I was expecting things to work much better.
      Hey, The problem with blurry scenery is not likely your computer. The problem with FSX is that it is a old program and does not utilize the hardware on modern systems,in fact it does not run high quality wide screen out of the box. There is a way to correct most of the issues by changing some basics within the config files of FSX. I found that with some tweaking you can get this program switched from its default 1024 resolution to 2048 or 4096. I addition put in the HIGHMEMFIX and set the config for widescreen. If you are having frame rate issues you can improve that very well. Simple things from setting your frame rate limiter in settings to UNLIMITED. The reason is that using the limiter puts more load on your processor and FSX is very processor dependent. It does not split the load very well. There is help on Youtube. See FSX Genius and go through his fixes. I am running 70fps with no blurries and with multiple screens open during flight. Did you know that in areas where the scenery is dense that FSX only uses 2 Gigs maximum of your ram? There is a way to get this program to use 4. If you are like me and addicted to flight simulation, you will take the time. PS: Hold off on getting the STEAM addition until Dovetail gets a new version out ( Lots of issues going on )
    1. darrinward777's Avatar
      darrinward777 -
      Quote Originally Posted by gtrbarbarian View Post
      Hi ...what ever happened to your Colorado scenery it was great, and I had it stored on a hard drive that went corrupt....I'd love to download those again!
      You can still get the work on simivation for free. It is in 4.7mm res. They had issues with the people who ran the server and it will take some time to correct that issue on Blue Sky's Network. Right now they are working on IDAHO. Can't wait for the Snake River Canyon in Twin Falls
    1. darrinward777's Avatar
      darrinward777 -
      Many thanks to the Blue Sky Team !!! Your product is far better than the payware known as Mega Scenery Version 2.0. I have purchased Virginia, Maryland, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Colorado and Missouri, Mega Scenery Colorado is a joke . The shading where sections meet like right in the middle of Denver the most populated region ruins the flight experience. The west side of town is far lighter in shading than the east. Mega Scenery does not correct airports either. Blue Sky is freeware that far exceeds other photo-scenery payware. If you guys did all the states, a lot of payware companies would be out of work.
  • Recent Forum Activity

    LTCSZ

    Micro Stutters In 4.4?

    Thread Starter: LTCSZ

    I am using Version 4.4...About every 5 seconds I experience a "micro-stutter" lasting about 1 second...I have no addons nor have I applied any...

    Last Post By: Kirk Today, 01:40 AM Go to last post
    flyboy208

    USS Nimitz CVN-68

    Thread Starter: flyboy208

    This is the reason I bought FSX. I could not stand it anymore, seeing all of the great screenshots at various FS sites, reading of it's praises, etc....

    Last Post By: Slickrock Today, 12:53 AM Go to last post
    T-VIRUS1234

    Increase download speeds

    Thread Starter: T-VIRUS1234

    why are the download speeds so slow??? this is 2018 not 1990, i have gigabit fiber optic and you are saying i can only get 50kb/s? it will take...

    Last Post By: rick Today, 12:30 AM Go to last post
    gmurray56

    How to start a blog?

    Thread Starter: gmurray56

    I have started recreating my actual flight log from my days of flying, and I would like to blog about it. How do I go about starting a blog? Thanks.

    Last Post By: JD-Slow-Thumbs Yesterday, 11:37 PM Go to last post