• Interview: Gottfried Razek and Joop Mak BlueSkyScenery

    Who would you consider to be your mentors or inspiration in the development world if you have any?

    I think we would both agree that all the developers who provide great freeware or payware add-ons are an inspiration to us. Everything that makes our hobby more realistic (enhances our feeling of flying) is always a positive and should be congratulated. Then there are the forums, full of generous people sharing their information and expertise. Without this community there would be far less add-ons and realism in FS.

           

    Gottfried, do you develop payware/freeware sceneries or both?

    Joop and I develop only freeware because it is our hobby and we would like it to stay that way. We don't want our hobby to become stressful and commercial. Furthermore, providing freeware gives us the widest audience possible.

    The Team

    Is the team just yourself and Joop, or are there any other members you work with?

    No, as you stated in your question, it's just Joop and myself.

    Have you worked with any other teams in the flight simming world?

    No, but Joop is also a member of the NL2000 team where he creates their airports too. As well as this, he also provided airports for Spanish, Italian and Hawaiian scenery projects.

    Real Life

    Do you have any experience in real aviation?

    Unfortunately my only experience with real aviation is as a passenger, but Joop has had lessons in both a Cessna and an ultralight.

           

    What started your interest in aviation?

    From my first flight as a passenger at the age of 12 I have been fascinated by flight. Think about it; what could possibly be better than soaring high above the ground and seeing everything far far below? Joop's interest with aviation started when he was bitten by the MSFS bug back in 1995. This was when FS5.1 was soaring high!

    Gottfried, do you and Joop have any memorable flights in real life?

    Some time back, I took a helicopter flight (Robinson R22) in San Diego, with just the pilot and myself. What I remember most, is that flying in such a small helicopter is totally different from flying in a big jet. You are so close to the ground and "feel" the thing flying by the seat of your pants. During this flight, we overflew the airport twice and below I could see all the big jets landing and departing. That was an experience I will never forget. For Joop, his most memorable flight was in a TECNAM ultralight in the northern part of Holland and again, is something he will never forget.

    Future

    How do you choose your next new design or project?

    Currently we are working on expanding our Idaho coverage. Idaho has some extremely beautiful mountain terrain like the Sawtooth area, so we are really looking forward to that. However, we won't say any more about this, as we want to keep a little surprise for you!

           

    What simulators do you design for now and which ones do you plan to develop for in the future?

    We develop only for FSX and P3D and have no current plans to change that.


    25 Comments
    1. Carob's Avatar
      Carob -
      I would be interested to know how people use their photo real sceneries. On what probably is an "average" system I tried to put together the majority of California and the computer and after about 5 minutes the computer could no longer render any of it and things were not useable. Refreshing the scenery made things work for about 20 seconds and then right back to everything being blurry. I was expecting things to work much better.
    1. fsxar177's Avatar
      fsxar177 -
      Sounds like you need a computer, my friend.

      I have used them for years, excellent performance - average system.
    1. Carob's Avatar
      Carob -
      Even the versions for FS9 that came out quite some time ago are system killers. I don't know who people ran them with the system that were out at that time.

      The system I was playing with these on is a Core2 Duo 3 Ghz with 6GB of RAM running Win7 64-bit with a GTX750 video card. I would think that should be plenty to run FS9 with the BlueSky stuff. But it's not.
    1. W33's Avatar
      W33 -
      Quote Originally Posted by Carob View Post
      Even the versions for FS9 that came out quite some time ago are system killers. I don't know who people ran them with the system that were out at that time.

      The system I was playing with these on is a Core2 Duo 3 Ghz with 6GB of RAM running Win7 64-bit with a GTX750 video card. I would think that should be plenty to run FS9 with the BlueSky stuff. But it's not.
      Let's first congratulate this team on the outstanding gift they have given to the community! Wonderful work and my thanks to you both. To often thanks is missing from users comments!

      Carob; it looks like you might have something wrong with your system as I've never had any problems running any of their fantastic sceneries. This is with a machine that is less powerful than your own.

      Thanks again for the interview.
    1. Carob's Avatar
      Carob -
      Carob; it looks like you might have something wrong with your system as I've never had any problems running any of their fantastic sceneries. This is with a machine that is less powerful than your own.

      Well I'd like some help figuring that out then as everything else is working just fine.
    1. modelr's Avatar
      modelr -
      Carob, sounds like you might have a video card getting hot.

      Also, are you running other programs at the same time? At just 3GHz, and two cores, you could be overwhelming the processor also, especially if you are having this happen at lower altitudes and fast aircraft. (100knots or faster.) Photo scenery uses a LOT of processing. Try flying at higher altitudes, above 3000ft AGL.

      My older machine did that at lower altitudes until I updated to a 4GHz multiple core (8 in my case, AMD) processor. And added extra cooling to the video card. Makes a huge difference.

      I also want to thank Gottfried and Joop for their sceneries. I use quite a bit of Bluesky Sceneries.
    1. marcori's Avatar
      marcori -
      I have not enough words to thank Gottfried and Joop for their outstanding work.
      I download all their sceneries and all them are loaded into my FSX (in a dedicated hard disk) and I never had any kind of problem, even with my older and less performing machines.
      Great job guys !!
    1. 3955's Avatar
      3955 -
      Gottfried, Joop,
      Superb work guys. Many thanks.
    1. jibrady's Avatar
      jibrady -
      I too have download almost all their scenery. It is outstanding! As mentioned in the interview, the work they put into color matching/balancing is what really makes their work so impressive. I always look forward to obtaining more scenery from them. If you have not tried their scenery than your really missing out!
      Jim
    1. phjoop's Avatar
      phjoop -
      Thanks for your comments, guys. We appreciate it very much.
      Joop
      BlueSkyScenery
    1. scottharmes6's Avatar
      scottharmes6 -
      I am also a very grateful and satisfied user of BlueSky scenery. It offers the most realistic flying experience, and there is nothing like flying over what the world really looks like. I am currently developing some photo scenery of my own, some of which is in Arizona around the Meteor Crater, and I am trying to match the colours with the adjacent Bluesky scenery. You guys are probably also working on it, but hey, if you beat me I don't care, because yours will definitely be the best. I have even made my areas the same size as yours so they will fit next to the AZ_North3, 4 and 5. I also made a 1m mesh for the crater area from elevation data from www.opentopography.org. This was all inspired by your brilliant work, so thanks again.
      Cheers, Scott
    1. Carob's Avatar
      Carob -
      Quote Originally Posted by modelr View Post
      Carob, sounds like you might have a video card getting hot.

      Also, are you running other programs at the same time? At just 3GHz, and two cores, you could be overwhelming the processor also, especially if you are having this happen at lower altitudes and fast aircraft. (100knots or faster.) Photo scenery uses a LOT of processing. Try flying at higher altitudes, above 3000ft AGL.

      My older machine did that at lower altitudes until I updated to a 4GHz multiple core (8 in my case, AMD) processor. And added extra cooling to the video card. Makes a huge difference.

      I also want to thank Gottfried and Joop for their sceneries. I use quite a bit of Bluesky Sceneries.
      Nothing else running and above 20,000. No way card is getting hot.
    1. DominicS's Avatar
      DominicS -
      Quote Originally Posted by Carob View Post
      Nothing else running and above 20,000. No way card is getting hot.
      Carob, please do not use the comment box here for support.

      If you require help, then please use the appropriate forums.

      Regards

      Dominic
    1. Carob's Avatar
      Carob -
      Tried to get help from BlueSky but got nowhere.
    1. scottharmes6's Avatar
      scottharmes6 -
      5 out of 14 comments are you complaining about a FREEWARE scenery. If you do not like it or it doesn't run well on your system, then uninstall it. Problem solved.
    1. gtrbarbarian's Avatar
      gtrbarbarian -
      Hi ...what ever happened to your Colorado scenery it was great, and I had it stored on a hard drive that went corrupt....I'd love to download those again!
    1. Airmail's Avatar
      Airmail -
      GREAT work.

      I'm too old to get out there and see it for real, but you guys bring that area to life for me.



      Carob, there are thousands using their software without any problem. These guys aren't getting rich by giving away exceptionally good software - FOR FREE!

      Start learning a little and stop expecting others to solve your problems.
    1. darrinward777's Avatar
      darrinward777 -
      Quote Originally Posted by Carob View Post
      I would be interested to know how people use their photo real sceneries. On what probably is an "average" system I tried to put together the majority of California and the computer and after about 5 minutes the computer could no longer render any of it and things were not useable. Refreshing the scenery made things work for about 20 seconds and then right back to everything being blurry. I was expecting things to work much better.
      Hey, The problem with blurry scenery is not likely your computer. The problem with FSX is that it is a old program and does not utilize the hardware on modern systems,in fact it does not run high quality wide screen out of the box. There is a way to correct most of the issues by changing some basics within the config files of FSX. I found that with some tweaking you can get this program switched from its default 1024 resolution to 2048 or 4096. I addition put in the HIGHMEMFIX and set the config for widescreen. If you are having frame rate issues you can improve that very well. Simple things from setting your frame rate limiter in settings to UNLIMITED. The reason is that using the limiter puts more load on your processor and FSX is very processor dependent. It does not split the load very well. There is help on Youtube. See FSX Genius and go through his fixes. I am running 70fps with no blurries and with multiple screens open during flight. Did you know that in areas where the scenery is dense that FSX only uses 2 Gigs maximum of your ram? There is a way to get this program to use 4. If you are like me and addicted to flight simulation, you will take the time. PS: Hold off on getting the STEAM addition until Dovetail gets a new version out ( Lots of issues going on )
    1. darrinward777's Avatar
      darrinward777 -
      Quote Originally Posted by gtrbarbarian View Post
      Hi ...what ever happened to your Colorado scenery it was great, and I had it stored on a hard drive that went corrupt....I'd love to download those again!
      You can still get the work on simivation for free. It is in 4.7mm res. They had issues with the people who ran the server and it will take some time to correct that issue on Blue Sky's Network. Right now they are working on IDAHO. Can't wait for the Snake River Canyon in Twin Falls
    1. darrinward777's Avatar
      darrinward777 -
      Many thanks to the Blue Sky Team !!! Your product is far better than the payware known as Mega Scenery Version 2.0. I have purchased Virginia, Maryland, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Colorado and Missouri, Mega Scenery Colorado is a joke . The shading where sections meet like right in the middle of Denver the most populated region ruins the flight experience. The west side of town is far lighter in shading than the east. Mega Scenery does not correct airports either. Blue Sky is freeware that far exceeds other photo-scenery payware. If you guys did all the states, a lot of payware companies would be out of work.
  • Recent Forum Activity

    Downwind66

    Gallery Images are blackened out on the main screen?

    Thread Starter: Downwind66

    Just wondering, did I hit an incorrect button, or is this something temporary? I can open each individual post and see the pictures clearly! ...

    Last Post By: Rupert Today, 08:41 PM Go to last post
    btbenoit

    Recommendation

    Thread Starter: btbenoit

    I'm looking to move on from FS2004. to a newer/more realistic flight sim. Is FSX the way to go?? Thanks

    Last Post By: Egsjr1956 Today, 08:38 PM Go to last post
    KevinvanBijsterveld

    Flight planner, Navigation and ATC

    Thread Starter: KevinvanBijsterveld

    Hello, I'm fairly new to FSX. I've been doing the missions and I'm pretty familiar with the Airbus A321. But in free flight I'm having some issues...

    Last Post By: StringBean Today, 08:28 PM Go to last post
    andyjohnston

    Fsw

    Thread Starter: andyjohnston

    I'm sure it comes as no surprise to anyone, but Flight Sim World is dead. ...

    Last Post By: JSkorna Today, 06:23 PM Go to last post