I would like a twin engine feeder aircraft like the Twin Otter...
http://www.flightsim.com/dcforum/Use...176e5cc885.jpg
What new default aircraft would you like to see with FS2004?
Chris
I would like a twin engine feeder aircraft like the Twin Otter...
http://www.flightsim.com/dcforum/Use...176e5cc885.jpg
What new default aircraft would you like to see with FS2004?
Chris
Who cares..? The default aircraft are only there to keep the proles happy.
Serious simmers await what the AFTERMARKET produces.
Simon Evans
When it comes to little details, I'm terribly predujiced towards default aircraft, like fuel flow gauge, suction gauge, trim adjustment suitability and a lot of other little details in instrumentational compatibility. Maybe that's wrong but it is a little easier to deal with than all the addon inconveniences.
Chris
The return of the Concorde
I agree!
I for one really like the default aircraft. Sure there are some problems here and there, but for the most part they are great. I'd like to see an Extra 300 that can actually perform advanced aerobatics like the:
"knife edge spin up"
"Tumble"
"Lomcevak"
"Snap roll"
"tail slide"
"swivel tower"
and others. I would also like to see more Hellicpters, and most of all Military jets.
Now I know your going to say, thoes are for combat sims, but I don't care, I like to fly them for the fun of it, not just to shoot things. In my opinion, the only really good military jet out is the T-38 Talon by FSD.
A real nice, stinkin Reims Caravan!
Is there one available at the moment?
And realistic rudder response.
John
I'd like to see a Lancair IVP, Mooney Bravo with a virtual cockpit, Cirrus SR22 for a few. I have quite a number of add-on planes and cannot dispute the prior comments. They are clearly better than the defaults.
>When it comes to little details,
>I'm terribly predujiced towards default
>aircraft, like fuel flow gauge,
>suction gauge, ...
>Chris
Does the 'Suction gauge' display exactly how much the default aircraft sucks?
Bookmarks