Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: VFR Test Flight

  1. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by odin View Post
    I have very similar PC spec to you and after trying the XPlane 10 demo I was getting 10fps with the default graphic settings so I would look at a quad core or something similar before buying the game. XP9 runs ok so im hoping I can make scenery for that and use it later in XP10.
    Default X-Plane 10 sceneries have a lot more details than the buildings I'm using:



    You'll get a lot more FPS with photo sceneries and OSM2XP buildings. But you have to be careful with the settings... some details are useless and can make change your simulator into a slide-show. You'll find performance tips here:
    http://developer.x-plane.com/2011/12...me-rates-pt-1/

    With my system, I usually get 60 FPS (locked with driver VSync)
    - Intel Core 2 @ 3.00 GHz / 4Gb DDR2 RAM
    - Nvidia GeForce 8800GT with 512Mb DDR3 VRAM and latest driver
    - Ubuntu GNU/Linux 10.04 Lucid Lynx 64-bit



    Use the Data Input & Output menu to display the FPS:
    http://wiki.x-plane.com/Chapter_5:_X..._Settings_Menu

    Happy flying.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Manchester,UK
    Posts
    69

    Default

    lol nice garden, i did something similar back in fs2004 but I realised that a camp fire with 3D moss on the rocks was a bit too much lol

    The thing I really like about XP is the light and shadows are warmer and more real, FSX makes me feel like im in a box with a distance light bulb.

    Thanks for the links.

    Quote Originally Posted by MdMax View Post
    Default X-Plane 10 sceneries have a lot more details than the buildings I'm using:



    You'll get a lot more FPS with photo sceneries and OSM2XP buildings. But you have to be careful with the settings... some details are useless and can make change your simulator into a slide-show. You'll find performance tips here:
    http://developer.x-plane.com/2011/12...me-rates-pt-1/

    With my system, I usually get 60 FPS (locked with driver VSync)
    - Intel Core 2 @ 3.00 GHz / 4Gb DDR2 RAM
    - Nvidia GeForce 8800GT with 512Mb DDR3 VRAM and latest driver
    - Ubuntu GNU/Linux 10.04 Lucid Lynx 64-bit



    Use the Data Input & Output menu to display the FPS:
    http://wiki.x-plane.com/Chapter_5:_X..._Settings_Menu

    Happy flying.

  3. Default

    Md Max

    I know this thread was started months ago, but I just discovered it. I'm curious, does moving ground traffic display when using OSM2XP scenery? Also do you recall the resolution of this scenery (m or cm/pixel)?

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flakman View Post
    I'm curious, does moving ground traffic display when using OSM2XP scenery? Also do you recall the resolution of this scenery (m or cm/pixel)?
    Yes, you can see moving ground traffic. OSM2XP is only for 3D buildings, forests and objects like water towers. XPOSM is for roads, railways and power lines.



    Resolution for 3D objects is awesome... source data for the buildings is OpenStreetMap. Resolution for the ground textures is sometimes better. I'm using "France 16" by Zone-Photos X-Plane, but you can find sceneries with higher resolutions like here, La Réunion, "zoom 18":

    http://forum.avsim.net/gallery/sizes...eunion/medium/
    Last edited by MdMax; 06-15-2012 at 01:23 AM.

  5. Default

    Thanks, MdMax, for your reply. I'm a longtime MSFSer and new to X_Plane. I did invest in X-Plane 10 and have bought the Carenado Mooney and the Jrollon CRJ. Now I'm in search of pleasing scenery to fly in. "Plausible world" doesn't yet cut it for me, but I'm willing to wait and see what is developed. Some of the photo scenery you have shown in this thread gives me hope.

    I asked the question about ground traffic because of some commercial photo scenery which I saw in a video which was combined with OSM2XP. The city was Copenagen, but I didn't see any moving ground traffic, which made me wonder if somehow the OSM2XP was inhibiting it. Also thanks for the links. I have much yet to learn about X-Plane scenery and X-Plane in general.

    Tom

    KSLE

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Aeroklub Pomorski (EPTO), Poland
    Posts
    1,890

    Default

    Amazing! XPlane wins with FSX in terms of scenery.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,774
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam24 View Post
    Amazing! XPlane wins with FSX in terms of scenery.
    Don't conclude so fast based on these screens. This is more of an exception.
    In general, XPlane scenery is boring. Bare airports and no urban environments (all suburban). Hopefully the building objects library (still a work in progress) gets expanded to include industrial, commercial and more high rise soon.

    The potential is there but it takes a lot of custom work (community effort). And I try to do my part to the best of my abilities. I've tried editing some airports and it's not so hard afterall.

    OSM2XP sometimes does not work as the buildings in most towns and cities are not maintained by the OSM community.
    Last edited by jomni; 06-20-2012 at 04:30 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Boeing 787 test flight skywriting flight plan
    By eagleworks4u in forum The Outer Marker
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-10-2012, 06:29 PM
  2. GenX Test Flight Video Presentation and First flight
    By punas1 in forum The Outer Marker
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-28-2007, 01:56 PM
  3. Another Flight From Norway. A VFR Flight On to Bergen-Flesland
    By geguic in forum MSFS Screen Shot Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-28-2006, 01:17 PM
  4. Test your VFR low altitude flying skills.
    By francara in forum FS2004
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-05-2005, 04:32 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-15-2003, 02:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •