Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: All real world Pilots, what add-on lands the best?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN, USA.
    Posts
    1,209

    Default All real world Pilots, what add-on lands the best?

    Just thought I'd post this question to all real world pilots around here to see what you guys think. What FS9 GA add-on lands the best based on your real world experience. Here's my list (based on what I own) with 1 being the best:

    1. RealAir's SF260
    2. Flight1's Commander
    3. Dreamfleet's A36
    4. Dreamfleet's Baron
    5. Caranado's 182Q

    I fly quite a bit and very few add-ons really capture those last few moments like these add-ons I mentioned above. I fly FS9 for obvious reasons. Without a fluid experience this whole topic is a mute point and I don't have the rig to produce what I get in FS9 in FSX. Anyway I'm curious as to what other experienced real world GA pilots think are the better GA aircraft that give the best feel when you get over the runway about to touch down.
    Last edited by Leo112; 08-09-2009 at 09:39 PM.

    DreamFleet, one of the best beta teams I had the pleasure to be on...
    Dell Duo Core 2.66 1333FSB - Windows 7 Pro 64Bit 4Gigs Ram
    NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 w/1gig Memory

  2. Default

    The full motion sims we train in don't even simulate landings realistically

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Rio de Janeiro
    Posts
    1,373
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    You have the answer.
    Besides the simpler the plane, the less unrealistic will be cause because it has to deal with less real problems. Thats why in your list the Real SF260 is the most reallistic. Of course, its just a litle basic simple plane.

    I can assure you the least reallistic would be a 747 while the Aircreation ultralight is not far from a real one.
    K

  4. #4

    Default

    IMO, the most fun of smaller aircraft; is the RealAir Spitfire. You can really sense power to weight in the landing phase; and it requires good judgment to get that perfect landing without a bounce. It either needs a bit of power on.... throughout the flare, or a good descent with the flare at the exact moment to maintain airspeed. However, I use the SF260 for the majority of simming. But I prefer it in FSX, unless using some good airport scenery for FS9.

    L.Adamson

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Hampshire, UK
    Posts
    47

    Default

    I've found payware a bit disappointing so far, but these mentions of RealAir - connected to the single most critical part of routine flying - encourage me to try again, and try RealAir. Thanks for that.

    Alhough, as it happens, no landing in sim or real life will ever feel quite right until someone programs a virtual Tiny Marshall (CFI Biggin Hill in the 60's) to sit next to me with his resigned expression as he ostentatously rearranges his pillows after one of my circuits and bumps... (a great man and a great teacher, so I hope you don't mind me honouring him here.)

Similar Threads

  1. Real World IMC pilots
    By RyanbATC in forum The Outer Marker
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-27-2009, 12:36 AM
  2. Real World Pilots...
    By Ragtopjohnny in forum The Outer Marker
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-19-2008, 02:14 AM
  3. How Many Real World Pilots Here?
    By Jeff S KDTW in forum The Outer Marker
    Replies: 132
    Last Post: 03-28-2008, 03:47 AM
  4. any real world pilots
    By bradders in forum DreamFleet General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-17-2002, 12:02 AM
  5. Real world pilots or student pilots?
    By TACJohn in forum The Outer Marker
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-30-2001, 03:23 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •