
Originally Posted by
barty
It would just go into the bank and circle when it should have captured the localizer (the needle was active, I had been monitoring it on NAV2).
I hope you won't be offended if I make joke. 
I know this isn't the case in the FS, but if I were the pilot, I'd turn in a ticket on suspicion that the BC light was burned out.
FWIW, NAV hold can be used to track a localizer in a non-precision approach. It will just use more coarse course correction in this mode but if you're centered on the localizer anyway, it doesn't make any difference.
As I said before NAV hold could be used to track a localizer beam, but why would you when the autopilot APPR mode is more sensitive? I still can not visualize a scenario that would constitute switching directly from NAV hold to APPR. When I'm tracking a radial from another VOR to the localizer appraoch angle, as in a STAR approach for instance, once on course, I'd switch from NAV hold to HDG hold before acquiring it. I'm not sure this is exactly correct though, and am always anxious to learn something new. It's just the way I've always done it.
If I'm wrong it certainly won't be the first time and stand to be corrected 
Regards
Herk
Acer Predator AG3620-UR308, 3rd Gen. Intel Core i7-3770 processor 3.4GHz with Turbo Boost 2.0 Technology up to 3.9GHz (8MB Cache), NVIDIA GeForce GT630 (2GB), 2 TB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive, 12GB DDR3 SDRAM, Windows 8
Bookmarks