Would like the differences clarified, please. It would take my poor 28K modem hours to search through the forums to find the old threads on this topic (I remember reading about it early in the summer). People have been rather helpful in the 'FS2K2 likes and dislikes' thread, but I'd like to be refreshed on the info. from the summer.
If I get a new card in the next few weeks before Thanksgiving, it would most likely be a GeForce2 MX with 32MB ($100 at my nearest CompUSA). I hear that the MX-200 is 'crap,' while the MX-400 is very good (or at least better relative to the MX). I won't consider the -200, but does the MX have the same limitations? And is the -400 that much better than the MX?
Can anyone with a straight MX and FS2K2 comment on whether the ground/chrome/water reflections are present? And whether the textures are sharp? These are the main reasons more my upgrade.
And please try to 'bump' this thread until 4:00 ET Monday, please! (when I next get online).
Thank you, any help appreciated,