Archer? Cardinal? C310?

[mtan002]

I am confused. I want a plane to do VFR like bush flying and scenry exploring, which one of the above should I get?

I got into a lot of troouble with the C172 that came with FS9 for not able to clear some of the hills.

Michael Tan
YSCB

[someone]

Neither one of them is really a true bush plane. For VFR, and IFR flying, the Archer is still my favorite.

[alastairmonk]

Likewise my favourite is still the Archer !

For Bush scenic flying you might like to look at the recently released freeware Maule or the payware Pilatus Porter from FSD.

Alastair

[shwncplnd]

If you had problems getting the 172 out of some areas, you'd have the same problem with the Archer. If you're into bush flying, you'll most likely need a STOL a/c. The a/c you mentioned by DF aren't really geared for very short gravel/grass runways.

[jaguar]

Maule is very good indeed and it is free.Archer,cardinal and 310 is
also excellent.I have also carenados 210,nam but that is not a bush
plane?
Rgds:Jukka

[RichLach]

This sounds like a request for STOL version. There probably is a STOL conversion available for the real aircraft. Maybe DF should consider offering a STOL model.