Signature controversy...

[Lisle]

between me, myself and I.

So i've decided to let yall choose for me
#1
http://www.flightsim.com/dcforum/Use...440c312146.jpg

#2
http://www.flightsim.com/dcforum/Use...930d470bb3.jpg

#3
http://www.flightsim.com/dcforum/Use...d50e6c1d8c.jpg

#4
http://www.flightsim.com/dcforum/Use...1d0f596b1d.jpg

and of course the old one

http://www.flightsim.com/dcforum/Use...8a10364b5f.jpg

[mcarvela]

I'll take a #3. But I think it should be reduced just a tad in size. Just my $.02

http://www.flightsim.com/dcforum/Use...f754c2e1eb.jpg

[Jeff S KDTW]

#3 also, but I agree, the dimensions and file size are too big. Ideally, the sig file size should not be more than 25K. :-)

[hr color=gray]http://home.earthlink.net/~snyders2000/ga.jpg

[coolian2]

As small as you can without losing image quality. See below.


http://www.flightsim.com/dcforum/Use...63715f03cc.jpg
Photo Copyright David Morrell 2002.

[lsdunch]

I'm with them - definitely #3.

Liam S. Dunch
Ex-pat Aussie
Tour Manager, Collette Vacations

[rudfus]

How do you get a Signature to working

[georgi55]

[font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON Feb-23-02 AT 01:31AM (EDT)[/font][p]I would say #2. #3 is cool too but looks too fake.
Georgi
http://www.flightsim.com/dcforum/Use...8446c87ce0.jpg http://www.flightsim.com/dcforum/Use...4b24187146.gif

Edit: d**n spelling! lol

[desibaba15]

my choice would also be #3

Ankit

[Lisle]

hey,
thanks I'll go with #3

(tis the last time your gonna see me with the below sig)http://www.flightsim.com/dcforum/Use...8a10364b5f.jpg

[tshannon]

I know you've already made up your mind, but I would have gone with #2. I'm diggin' the sun-burst with the halo effect... gives it that surreal edge.