Meigs

**clynefan** · 10-09-2003, 11:30 PM

Wow!

Thanks for the comparison shots! I have a hard time remembering what older versions even looked like anymore, so that was pretty cool to see.

**Radooh** · 10-09-2003, 11:41 PM

the one problem that pops out at me is that the pathways and roads are much more visible in fs98 when the ones in 2004 are blurred satellite images.

Thanks for the comparison

**Keyno** · 10-10-2003, 01:31 AM

Man thats FS98? holy dodoo, i started at FSforWin95, what did that look like? Man i think im gonna be sick, lol.

Keyno

**CLE757** · 10-10-2003, 04:27 AM

Look at FS98 now, They sure as hell work way better now then they have when it came out. If you have lousy fps with FS9, then go back to FS98 :)

http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-8/60403/cle757.JPG

**NBflight** · 10-10-2003, 07:15 AM

Great comparison pictures! :)
I remember the times of FS 3.0 ! No ground textures at all, it was just a green, flat area. :) And all cockpits looked exactly the same way, no difference sitting in the skylane or the lear. :-lol But it was just great that time!

:-wave norbert

**jpy8** · 10-10-2003, 07:19 AM

It has come a long way but i do agree that the roads and paths look alto clearer on FS98

**slarente** · 10-10-2003, 10:11 AM

... and I remember saying "Wow, it looks so real!"... That was for FS5. Said the same thing for 98, 2000 and so on...

Man, was I that blind? :-)

Simon