ajrendall
02-05-2004, 06:36 AM
I have a rather old PC (Athlon 1GHz) with an old nVidia card (GeForce 2 MX 400 64Mb). I can currently get 15 to 20 fps out of ACOF which for me is perfectly useable (mind you, I can't display some of the nicer bits like detailed clouds or dense autogen stuff).
I decided to upgrade (ha, ha) to a more recent display card and had a shop around for a cheap replacement. Since I have a spare monitor, I thought that a dual head card might be nice and I found a Radeon 9200SE card with 128Mb on board and proper 4X AGP, so I bought it.
I would have thought that with more memory the card would at least be smoother/faster than my old one. To my surprise, it seems to be about 20% slower. On top of that, it produces the worst jerk-o-vision and unstable frame rate I have seen since shaky-cam was invented. On top of that, the texture quality seems to be worse (lots of spots and stuff where there weren't any before) and some textures don't display at all.
Is this right? I checked all my settings (and those of the card driver - latest from the ATI site), I even remebered to check my BIOS settings for the AGP bits to try and get the best throughput.
Why on earth is my old (slower, smaller) card better?
I have since reverted back to the original card and got a refund.
I would be interested to hear why the above could happen.
TIA.
Andrew.
I decided to upgrade (ha, ha) to a more recent display card and had a shop around for a cheap replacement. Since I have a spare monitor, I thought that a dual head card might be nice and I found a Radeon 9200SE card with 128Mb on board and proper 4X AGP, so I bought it.
I would have thought that with more memory the card would at least be smoother/faster than my old one. To my surprise, it seems to be about 20% slower. On top of that, it produces the worst jerk-o-vision and unstable frame rate I have seen since shaky-cam was invented. On top of that, the texture quality seems to be worse (lots of spots and stuff where there weren't any before) and some textures don't display at all.
Is this right? I checked all my settings (and those of the card driver - latest from the ATI site), I even remebered to check my BIOS settings for the AGP bits to try and get the best throughput.
Why on earth is my old (slower, smaller) card better?
I have since reverted back to the original card and got a refund.
I would be interested to hear why the above could happen.
TIA.
Andrew.