How are the Imagine Simulation sceneries?

[cloudflyer]

Particularly interested in KEWR and KLGA. I'd like to hear from someone who has used them.

Michael

[Leo112]

THEIR GGRREEAAATT!!! :)

Actually the sceneries are really nice especially the later work. The early stuff like KEWR and KDTW are a little hard (well KEWR is very hard) on framerates with machines that have CPU speeds around 2.6 to 3gigs single core. A rig higher than that shouldn't any problem with any of the sceneries.

[cloudflyer]

Could someone compare the KEWR scenery to FSDreamTeam's KORD in terms of computer capability.

[joedav1969]

I've had simflyers EWR and Imagine Sim EWR and I like the Sim Flyers better, funny enough the only one of Imagine Sim's sceneries that is tough on frame rates for me is KEWR all the other airports they make are great.

I just bought FS Dream Team's KORD and it is great, frame rates around the gates is a little tough but on take offs and landings (Where it counts for me) its great. Plus if you have the AES software its fantastic.

Joe
Chicago, USA

[Leo112]

Could someone compare the KEWR scenery to FSDreamTeam's KORD in terms of computer capability.

There's no comparison. FSDreamTeam's work is new and the techniques they use are cutting edge. There's way more detail in KORD than Imaginesim's KEWR and the look of the two is drastic as well. The problem you'll face is the only game in town for KEWR is Imaginesim's work. You could always stick to the default KORD which I've always thought wasn't that bad for being a free option included with FS9...

[fly21]

I picked up the CVG. It's very close to the real thing. I live next to CVG and have flown out of it several times. I haven't downloaded any others: yet.