soldano
11-06-1998, 12:00 PM
CFS runs flawlesly at my PII 266,w/ Viper 330 and Monster
2 12Mb, also it runs very smoothly with maximun detail
scenery and all options checked.- There is a curious diference
with FS98: At FS98 the maximun resolution option for the Mons
ter 2 is 1024, and for the Viper 1920; At 1024, the Viper out
performs the Monster (+25% frame rate); exactly the opposite
happens at CFS where the maximun resolution option for the Viper
is 800X600 and for the Monster 1024X768.- In this game,the Monster
runs faster than the Viper and with better image quality.-
Is it that CFS has been optimized for Monster 2 ?.- As far as I
know, FS98 doesnt support Glide (the 3DFX API), so the Monster
runs as a D3d (the MS API) card, I think the same happens with
CFS,(a single Monster running at glide only supports 800X600,
and the game allows 1024X768, a resolution that only two monster2
at SLI configuration can reach)
Has anybody an idea about?
Jorge
2 12Mb, also it runs very smoothly with maximun detail
scenery and all options checked.- There is a curious diference
with FS98: At FS98 the maximun resolution option for the Mons
ter 2 is 1024, and for the Viper 1920; At 1024, the Viper out
performs the Monster (+25% frame rate); exactly the opposite
happens at CFS where the maximun resolution option for the Viper
is 800X600 and for the Monster 1024X768.- In this game,the Monster
runs faster than the Viper and with better image quality.-
Is it that CFS has been optimized for Monster 2 ?.- As far as I
know, FS98 doesnt support Glide (the 3DFX API), so the Monster
runs as a D3d (the MS API) card, I think the same happens with
CFS,(a single Monster running at glide only supports 800X600,
and the game allows 1024X768, a resolution that only two monster2
at SLI configuration can reach)
Has anybody an idea about?
Jorge