PDA

View Full Version : 747-400 and 777-300



B747_400
01-26-2002, 09:43 PM
Can anyone tell me which US Airlines operate both 747-400 and 777-300.

Thanks

pacallen
01-26-2002, 11:04 PM
Hrm.... United... I can't think of any more (Continental currently operates 777-300s and used to operate 744s, but not anymore)

For international, I know KLM, British Airways, Cathay Pacific, Singapore Airlines, Korean Airlines, and JAL are all that I can think of.
http://www.kcsportscalendar.net/signature1.jpg

sheesh2001
01-27-2002, 12:05 AM
since when do Continental and United operate 777-300s? The only 777-300s I've ever seen are with Emirates and Singapore Airlines.

Alex

nwabri
01-27-2002, 12:08 AM
And, Continental never operated the 747-400, they did operate 100's, and I think 200's as well, but the only US Airlines to operate the 747-400 is United and Northwest, and as it stands now, I believe (however I could be wrong on this) UAL and NWA are the only US Airline to operate 747's at all at this time.

Brian A. Neuman
Wooodbury, MN

B747_400
01-27-2002, 12:24 AM
Thanks for the info. I wonder if you could answer two more questions. What are the external differences between the 747-400 and the 747’s that TWA operated and are any of the former TWA 747’s still in service?

Thanks again,

Bryan

nwabri
01-27-2002, 12:34 AM
LAST EDITED ON Jan-27-02 AT 00:35AM (EDT)[p]Ok, there are many differences between the 747-100's, 200's, and then the 300's and 400's. Visually, the 747-400 differs by the winglets at the end of the wings. The 747-300 and 400 both have extened upper decks (take a look, it is very obvious). And in the end, the 400 has better engines, greater capacity, and much greater range then the 747's of old. Also, the 747-400 I believe only needs a flight crew of 2, while the older ones needed 3. There are many other techical differences, but these are the most obvious.

And about TWA, I think they took all thier 747's out of service a while ago, and even if they were still flying, I think American would retire them. AA hasnt flown a 747 in at least 10 years, probably even longer then that.

Brian A. Neuman
Wooodbury, MN

B747_400
01-27-2002, 01:04 AM
Hey Brian

Thanks for the 747 info. As you’ve probably guessed I’m new to airplanes. Railroads and locomotives are my area of expertise. I can tell you difference between an SD40, SD40-2 & DF40-2 but I’m clueless when it comes to aircraft.

Thanks Again,

Bryan Smith

Shibinik
01-27-2002, 01:11 AM
Malaysian Airlines as well...

pacallen
01-27-2002, 01:28 AM
My bad... I was just thinking of 777s in general (-200). As for the continental 747-400, I was searching under the flightsim.com file library and found one or two so I assumed they were once in service by Continental. I guess I should have used airliners.net or something more reliable...


http://www.kcsportscalendar.net/signature1.jpg

joea
01-28-2002, 12:04 PM
Bryan, welcome to the forum and FS. Just out of curiousity I have been mulling getting Mstrain sim and wondered what you think about it? (I for my part have no idea what those locomotives you were are...)
Joe Apostolidis
Supporter of FS, quality add-ons, and real aviation
VFR or IFR, low and slow or high in the sky, I fly everything!

shaun3000
01-28-2002, 03:43 PM
If you like trains, get Train Sim. it is TONS of fun. And www.train-sim.com (by the same folks that operate flightsim.com) is wonderful, with plenty of trains and activities to keep you occupied. One guy's even made a maglev train!