![]() |

ell,
it's been some time since my
preliminary
review...time that has changed my opinion on FSFW95. At first I
loved it as you see from my preliminary review. Well, I did. Until I
used it for a couple of weeks and found out that depending on where I
flew, the performance on my new P133 was not acceptable. The result
is after trying to figure out how to improve the new flight sim's
performance, I became exhausted and fed up with trying to fix
something that just wasn't meant to be. Here's why I gave up FSFW95
and returned to FS5.1 and am currently happier than ever with the
operation of FS5.
This performance is totally unacceptable. Even a neat game like
Monster Truck Madness runs jerky in a similar manner under Win95!
This is not a problem exclusive to FSFW95 but the inability of Win95
and DirectX to run games and graphics.
Too bad, because in my mind, what good is a flight simulator that pauses and stops on a P133. I can only imagine the anguish others have on slower machines.
To some, FSFW95 is acceptable. I wouldn't have removed it if it weren't for the pausing. I loved some of the new features, dispite some that we lost with the new version. But now as I fly FS5 in style, through DOS, I realise how great and tweaked with scenery and adventures it was and that now, I feel as my "new" flightsim is indeed FS5.1.
I am sure FSFW95 will be patched, or maybe "FS7" will arrive soon, but whatever the case is, the current FSFW95 is a beta progam at best that looks good only when parked at the ramp!