FlightSim.Com Reviews: Berlin 2000
REVIEWS

Berlin 2000

By Phillip M. Overgaard (24 June 1999)


Berlin 2000 uses no default buildings. This makes for a customized and realistic look. Some static aircraft would be nice though.
What good would Flight Simulator be without scenery? Furthermore, what good would it be without the available add-on sceneries available from commercial, shareware and freeware sources? Let's just say you wouldn't be able to give FS away. With that said, let's begin.

First Impressions

When Aerosoft's Scenery Berlin 2000 (B2K for short) first arrived, I examined the box and its contents just to see how well it was packaged. As Aerosoft is a German company, nearly all the text on the outside of the box was in German. No big deal, I wasn't interested in the box but rather what was inside. What I found inside was what I feel essential for commercial scenery releases: a manual, the CD (of course!) and charts of the area. I was very pleased that the charts were none other than Jeppesen. No one does aviation charts better!


By using the manual installation option, you must use the FS98 Scenery Library to add the scenery to the database.

Language Barrier

As I said before, Aerosoft is a German company. While the included manual for B2K appears to be very complete, only those who can read German will be able to benefit from it. Included are installation instructions, information on the 25 airports included on the CD, navaid information and Jeppesen instrument approach charts for Tegel, Schonefeld and Tempelhof (in English thankfully!). The two installation options have also been translated into English. The user has the option of using the automatic procedure common in other commercial sceneries or you can manually install the files using the FS98 Scenery Library. Fearing that the automatic installation on-screen instructions would be in German too, I chose to install the "scenery" and "texture" folders manually using the same procedure that is common for freeware scenery files.


The trees surrounding the airport look as if they need to be watered.

The Scenery

The real reason to have B2K is for the detailed scenery. That's exactly what you get. As I flew around Berlin, I didn't see any of those awful default buildings anywhere. I'll go so far as to say that they were all custom designed for this particular release. The publishers included a VFR (Visual Flight Rules) GPS (Global Positioning System) map of Berlin and the surrounding area. It is extremely helpful in finding airports and navaids. The Aerosoft website implies that this chart is an original. The chart that I received was a photocopy of an original. What's more, it was not in color, which made it hard at first to distinguish navaid names and frequencies from other info. Frame rates were OK, about 8-10 in the Very Dense setting on the ground, improving to 15 and above once airborne (on a Cyrix 300MHz, 32MB RAM).


A nice thing to see is what looks like wildflowers growing in the grass at Tegel. Makes it feel like summer!
All was not well, however. As you can see by some of the screenshots, there are large patches of bland textures. The "grass" around Tempelhof is also bland. To me, the ground textures resemble those that surround the default London area with the latter being of better quality. It's not every day you hear someone say the default scenery is better than an add-on is it? Ground textures in B2K just do not look real. I've seen better-looking textures in freeware scenery.

I wanted to do some site seeing during my time over the skies of Berlin. I succeeded instead at getting lost! I attribute this to the lack of information on were to locate such famous landmarks as "Checkpoint Charlie". Of course, that information may have been in the manual, in German.


While ground textures were colorful, they were still bland. Compare this to the default London area to see what I mean.

Closing Thoughts

I contacted Aerosoft to determine if they have or plan to have an English language version of the scenery. As of this writing, I have heard nothing. Not knowing German, I feel that I missed out on a lot of information about the area's airports. As a result, I didn't enjoy it as much as I could have. I knew I should have studied German in high school!


The approach into Tempelhof. The good looking buildings can't hide the fact that the grass surrounding the runway and taxiways is bland.
Is it worth spending money on this product? I would have to say that there are better products to spend your money on. Great buildings and Instrument Approach Charts are not enough. Aerosoft could reach a wider audience if they translated the entire manual into other languages, especially English. But since they are a German company offering scenery of Germany perhaps they are only targeting a German audience.

Phillip M. Overgaard
overgard@7cities.net


[ Back | Main Menu | Logout | Help ]

Copyright © 1999 by FlightSim.Com. All Rights Reserved.